2020
DOI: 10.2188/jea.je20190026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relative Validity of Starch and Sugar Intake in Japanese Adults as Estimated With Comprehensive and Brief Self-Administered Diet History Questionnaires

Abstract: Background: In Japan, large-scale epidemiological studies on starch and sugar intake are scarce, mainly due to a lack of a suitable assessment tool. We examined the relative validity of two widely-used dietary assessment questionnaires for Japanese adults, the comprehensive Diet History Questionnaire (DHQ) and the brief DHQ (BDHQ), for estimating the intake of starch and 10 types of sugars: total sugar, sucrose, maltose, lactose, trehalose, glucose, fructose, galactose, and added and free sugars. Methods: A to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(89 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, we observed that the reproducibility of the six-item tool had better performance than its relative validity against the FFQ. While we cannot predict if a larger sample size would yield stronger analysis, our observation may be attributable to the inherent weakness of brief dietary intake screening tools, as several other studies with larger sample sizes have drawn similar conclusions (52)(53)(54) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Finally, we observed that the reproducibility of the six-item tool had better performance than its relative validity against the FFQ. While we cannot predict if a larger sample size would yield stronger analysis, our observation may be attributable to the inherent weakness of brief dietary intake screening tools, as several other studies with larger sample sizes have drawn similar conclusions (52)(53)(54) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Added sugar intake was similarly calculated based on a recently developed comprehensive composition database by subtracting total sugar contents derived from fruit juices from free sugar contents [ 31 ]. According to studies assessing the relative validity of the BDHQ against the 16-day dietary records in Japanese women aged 31–69 years, the median value of Spearman’s correlation coefficients for food intake was 0.44 (range: 0.14–0.82) [ 28 ], the corresponding value of Pearson’s correlation coefficients for nutrient intake was 0.54 (range: 0.34–0.87) [ 29 ], and the Spearman’s correlation coefficients for added sugar was 0.40 [ 32 ]. Food and nutrient intakes were energy-adjusted, using the density method for assessing dietary intake differences because of varied energy requirements and to reduce the influence of misreporting [ 33 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dietary intake was evaluated using the brief-type selfadministered diet history questionnaire (BDHQ), which consists of 58 food and beverage items that have been validated against dietary records (20)(21)(22) and comprises items that are commonly consumed, according to the National Health and Nutrition Survey in Japan (23). The BDHQ examined only the frequency of consumption of the food and beverage items in the preceding month.…”
Section: Dietary Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%