2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10488-019-00921-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relative Technical Efficiency Assessment of Mental Health Services: A Systematic Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of ESMS/DESDE system in health economics and health financing identified in this review is particularly relevant for health policy and its incorporation into real world decision support systems routinely used by public agencies to inform their planning strategies [82,103].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of ESMS/DESDE system in health economics and health financing identified in this review is particularly relevant for health policy and its incorporation into real world decision support systems routinely used by public agencies to inform their planning strategies [82,103].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, setting (S) referred to the countries included in the review. Although the PRISMA guidelines were initially designed for reviewing research articles where their (P) was "patients", previous work has shown that the methodology is also appropriate for reviewing studies whose population or unit of study are MH services or systems [47][48][49].…”
Section: Search Strategy and Eligibility Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DEA [ 9 ] was selected to evaluate the RTE of MH-supported accommodation services. This nonparametric technique has been widely used to assess health service performance [ 30 ] and, to a lesser extent, to evaluate MH services [ 6 ]. The standard DEA model is a linear programming one which structure is: where d is the number of DMU, i the number of inputs and j the number of outputs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The incorporation of quality variables in performance assessments (represented by six/seven quality domains in this study) is always complicated because these variables are subjective (perceived quality from users, managers, etc.). To our knowledge, this study is the first to include quality domains estimated by the managers of the selected MH services in a performance analysis [ 6 ]. Independent of the technical performance of the services (the baseline scenario analysed without quality domains), the main research objective is to assess the impact on service performance when quality domains are incorporated into the analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation