2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jag.2009.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relative suitability of indices derived from Landsat ETM+ and SPOT 5 for detecting fire severity in sagebrush steppe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While dNBR provides a measure of absolute change, RdNBR is adjusted to account for pre-fire conditions at each pixel. As such, RdNBR provides a more consistent measure of burn severity than dNBR when evaluating severity across broad regions and diverse vegetation (Miller et al 2009a, Norton et al 2009), including sites with low preburn biomass. As an indirect measure of biomass loss, RdNBR can be used to accurately identify stand-replacing fire in forests and woodlands (Miller and Thode 2007).…”
Section: Topography and Climate Are Likely Important Drivers Of Burn mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While dNBR provides a measure of absolute change, RdNBR is adjusted to account for pre-fire conditions at each pixel. As such, RdNBR provides a more consistent measure of burn severity than dNBR when evaluating severity across broad regions and diverse vegetation (Miller et al 2009a, Norton et al 2009), including sites with low preburn biomass. As an indirect measure of biomass loss, RdNBR can be used to accurately identify stand-replacing fire in forests and woodlands (Miller and Thode 2007).…”
Section: Topography and Climate Are Likely Important Drivers Of Burn mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More such studies are needed for longer-term assessment of fire effects. Keeley et al (2008) found that RdNBR accuracy is limited in shrublands where resprouting occurs, but RdNBR has been tested successfully in forests, woodlands, and sagebrush shrublands in California Thode 2007, Miller et al 2009a) and sagebrush steppe in Idaho (Norton et al 2009). Fourth, it is possible that the consistently higher performance of topographic variables in the Random Forest models is an artifact of the difference in spatial scale.…”
Section: Scope and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25,26 Despite these challenges, an optical remote-sensing signal capable of characterization exists for semiarid shrublands, and monitoring is feasible. [26][27][28][29][30][31][32] Studies within the sagebrush ecosystem have demonstrated the ability for remote sensing to characterize more abrupt types of disturbance from fire 33,34 and human development 35,36 and gradual types of disturbance such as grazing 37 and climate change. 23 A comprehensive understanding of the relationship between remote-sensing change and gradual changes in sagebrush ecosystem components is still lacking; only a few studies have begun to explore that relationship.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This table was tested mainly in forested environments, and there are known differences in applying NBR to dryland ecosystems (Norton et al, 2009). Regardless, we used the below information for a relative measure of NBR between our study regions.…”
Section: Correlation Between the Fusion Product And Modis Asphalt Pixmentioning
confidence: 99%