2018
DOI: 10.3389/feart.2018.00129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relative Sea-Level Changes and Ice Sheet History in Finderup Land, North Greenland

Abstract: Rising global sea level caused by melting ice sheets poses a major challenge in a persistently warming climate. The Greenland Ice Sheet (GrIS) is among the main contributors, and in order to make accurate predictions of future ice retreat and sea level rise, it is imperative to understand how the ice sheet responded to global warming in the past. Reconstructions of relative sea level (RSL) are a key constraint in models of past ice sheet fluctuations, however, high-precision data has until now been sparse in N… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
39
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
3
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Knowing that Grødheimsvatnet must have been isolated before Kringlemyr (due to the higher outlet altitude), we find that unit III is the most likely candidate for a marine–lacustrine transitional phase in Grødheimsvatnet based on lithostratigraphic criteria and geochemical variations. Decreasing Ca/Fe ratios in the upper part of unit II indicate a gradually smaller influx of marine‐sourced Ca as we approach the lower boundary of unit III (Strunk et al , ), whereas the distinct dark laminations and increased sulphur values within the unit itself (Fig. ) are typical features of a marine–lacustrine transitional phase (Kaland, ; Kjemperud, ; Svendsen and Mangerud, ; Lohne et al , ; Balascio et al , ; Long et al , ; Romundset et al , ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Knowing that Grødheimsvatnet must have been isolated before Kringlemyr (due to the higher outlet altitude), we find that unit III is the most likely candidate for a marine–lacustrine transitional phase in Grødheimsvatnet based on lithostratigraphic criteria and geochemical variations. Decreasing Ca/Fe ratios in the upper part of unit II indicate a gradually smaller influx of marine‐sourced Ca as we approach the lower boundary of unit III (Strunk et al , ), whereas the distinct dark laminations and increased sulphur values within the unit itself (Fig. ) are typical features of a marine–lacustrine transitional phase (Kaland, ; Kjemperud, ; Svendsen and Mangerud, ; Lohne et al , ; Balascio et al , ; Long et al , ; Romundset et al , ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The sediment cores were dated using a combination of radiocarbon dating and palaeomagnetic intensity measurements (Strunk et al . ). All of the sediment cores were checked for organic remains that could be used for radiocarbon dating.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We did not proceed with bulk radiocarbon dating as a previous attempt at bulk dating of sediments from T2 yielded ‘too old’ ages probably due to the incorporation of reworked carbon (Strunk et al . ). It was only possible to find sufficient foraminifera for radiocarbon dating in some intervals within the marine units and combined with palaeomagnetic intensity measurements this made the basis of the sediment‐core chronologies for T2 and T8.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations