1985
DOI: 10.1097/00000542-198509001-00189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relative Resistance to Shearing of Commercially Available Epidural Catheters Versus Available Epidural Needles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The paucity of papers concerning complications possibly indicates that there are few. Indeed Ballance [3] found few references, and these were mainly concerned with the catheter becoming trapped at various bone sites [4], knotting [5] and fracture [6]. One of the concerns when bench testing these catheters was that the distal parts, containing as they d o side holes, might be weaker than the rest of the catheter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The paucity of papers concerning complications possibly indicates that there are few. Indeed Ballance [3] found few references, and these were mainly concerned with the catheter becoming trapped at various bone sites [4], knotting [5] and fracture [6]. One of the concerns when bench testing these catheters was that the distal parts, containing as they d o side holes, might be weaker than the rest of the catheter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%