2003
DOI: 10.1364/josab.20.002226
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relative-phase ambiguities in measurements of ultrashort pulses with well-separated multiple frequency components

Abstract: Ultrashort-pulse characterization techniques, such as the numerous variants of frequency-resolved optical gating (FROG) and spectral phase interferometry for direct electric-field reconstruction, fail to fully determine the relative phases of well-separated frequency components. If well-separated frequency components are also well separated in time, the cross-correlation variants (e.g., XFROG) succeed, but only if short, wellcharacterized gate pulses are used.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(43 reference statements)
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Proposed in 1998 by Iaconis and Wamsley [7,15], SPIDER and its many variants have been recognized as an exceptional tool for characterizing pulses [4,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. Its success is due to its intrinsically ultrafast [18] and single-shot [19] nature, as well as to its simple, direct and robust phase retrieval procedure [14,15].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Proposed in 1998 by Iaconis and Wamsley [7,15], SPIDER and its many variants have been recognized as an exceptional tool for characterizing pulses [4,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. Its success is due to its intrinsically ultrafast [18] and single-shot [19] nature, as well as to its simple, direct and robust phase retrieval procedure [14,15].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classical SPIDER derives the pump from the PUT [4,7,15], making the technique intrinsically self-referencing. Alternatively, the use of a well-characterized pump reference pulse can improve the accuracy and reliability of the method [20], and this approach is commonly named X-SPIDER [4,21,23]. Typical SPIDER and X-SPIDER methods are designed for the characterization of optical pulses shorter than 100fs [4] and peak powers exceeding 10kW, and hence are not ideally suited to telecommunications.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, conventional self-referenced phase measurement techniques fail to fully measure the phase of a pulse with well-separated spectral components [22]. It can make SHG optimization a more attractive option for such measurements.…”
Section: Structured Spectrummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The well-established methods of the past two decades, including FROG [11], SPIDER [12], MIIPS [13], and D-Scan [14], have played important roles in the development of ultrafast laser sources and for characterizing laser pulses used in a wide range of experiments. However, they suffer from a number of limitations in their capabilities: (i) they measure only the spectral/temporal intensity and dispersion/chirp, not the full electric field, including the carrier-envelope phase (CEP); (ii) they cannot measure the relative phase across spectral nulls without an auxiliary field with a bandwidth that spans the null [15,16]; (iii) for ultrabroad bandwidth pulses, the bandwidth and efficiency of the measurement is limited by the requirement to use a nonlinear material to act as a time-stationary filter; and (iv) the pulse is rarely measured in situ, which necessitates a careful calibration of the linear and nonlinear space-time propagation of the pulse from the diagnostic to the site of the experiment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%