2014
DOI: 10.1137/130943613
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relative Perturbation Theory for Diagonally Dominant Matrices

Abstract: Abstract. In this paper, strong relative perturbation bounds are developed for a number of linear algebra problems involving diagonally dominant matrices. The key point is to parameterize diagonally dominant matrices using their off-diagonal entries and diagonally dominant parts and to consider small relative componentwise perturbations of these parameters. This allows us to obtain new relative perturbation bounds for the inverse, the solution to linear systems, the symmetric indefinite eigenvalue problem, the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result combined with the perturbation results for the D and U factors presented in [14] show that the column diagonal dominance pivoting strategy for row diagonally dominant matrices leads, simultaneously, to LDU factorizations that are guaranteed to be rank-revealing decompositions, i.e., the factors L and U are guaranteed to have small condition numbers, and that always undergo small relative perturbations under the structured perturbations considered in this work. The perturbation results presented in this paper are fundamental to prove in [10] that essentially all interesting magnitudes corresponding to row diagonally dominant matrices undergo small relative variations under small relative perturbations in the diagonally dominant parts and off-diagonal entries and, therefore, that these magnitudes can be computed with high accuracy by algorithms based on rank-revealing decompositions [5,11,15,17,39].…”
Section: Then We Havementioning
confidence: 96%
“…This result combined with the perturbation results for the D and U factors presented in [14] show that the column diagonal dominance pivoting strategy for row diagonally dominant matrices leads, simultaneously, to LDU factorizations that are guaranteed to be rank-revealing decompositions, i.e., the factors L and U are guaranteed to have small condition numbers, and that always undergo small relative perturbations under the structured perturbations considered in this work. The perturbation results presented in this paper are fundamental to prove in [10] that essentially all interesting magnitudes corresponding to row diagonally dominant matrices undergo small relative variations under small relative perturbations in the diagonally dominant parts and off-diagonal entries and, therefore, that these magnitudes can be computed with high accuracy by algorithms based on rank-revealing decompositions [5,11,15,17,39].…”
Section: Then We Havementioning
confidence: 96%
“…We compute λ 1,h by applying inverse iteration 2 to B h and we use the termination criterion B −1 h x k −µ k x k / x k ≤ nu|µ k |. In applying B −1 h , we compare the methods of using the Cholesky factorization of B h and using the accurate LDL T factorization of T N + h 2 D and T N in (18). We denote the computed eigenvalues by µ chol 1 and µ aldu 1 respectively and present the results in Table 2.…”
Section: Biharmonic Operator With the Natural Boundary Conditionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many special classes of matrices have been identified for which the singular values (or eigenvalues) are determined and can be computed to high relative accuracy (i.e. removing κ 2 (A) in (1)); see [4,18,19,21,22,24,25,26,28,33,43] and the recent survey [30] for more details.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the accuracy is still expected to depend on 1/c i . See [9,Theorem 6.3] for some some related discussions for diagonally dominant matrices. Finally, we discuss an application to discretizations of differential operators, which is a large source of ill-conditioned problems.…”
Section: Application To Eigenvalue Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%