2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11242-014-0414-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relative Permeability of Coal: A Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 122 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Relative permeability functions derived from Zhang et al [65] were tested in this context for the coal seam layer but show only a negligible effect on the water flow calculations in our models. Taking this finding into account and aiming at improving numerical convergence, we assume that the relative permeability functions given in Equations (8) and (9) are valid for both lithological layers, while capillary pressure effects can be neglected.…”
Section: Numerical Model Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relative permeability functions derived from Zhang et al [65] were tested in this context for the coal seam layer but show only a negligible effect on the water flow calculations in our models. Taking this finding into account and aiming at improving numerical convergence, we assume that the relative permeability functions given in Equations (8) and (9) are valid for both lithological layers, while capillary pressure effects can be neglected.…”
Section: Numerical Model Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4.2 Bubble-water flow in a capillary tube with barriers inside 4.2.1 Effects of capillary pressure on bubble-water flow As pointed out by Clarkson et al (2011) and Zhang et al (2015), capillary pressure is essential in characterising the bubble-water flow behaviour in porous media. In this section, two sets of simulations are performed, based on the geometries shown in Fig.…”
Section: Effects Of Bubble Size On Bubble-water Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have been done to understand the two-phase flow physics in coal seams (Clarkson et al, 2011;Kalam et al, 2012;Karacan, 2013;Zhang et al, 2015). However, most of them are either based on laboratory core flooding experiment data or field data, and they cannot explain the factors controlling the multiphase flow at pore scale (Dawe et al, 2011;Ofori et al, 2010;Shen et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The various methods used to determine or derive relative permeability of coal, and the limitations of these methods, were reviewed by Zhang et al (2015); these methods include unsteady-state and state-state laboratory core flooding experiments, capillary pressure measurements of cores, and history matching of production data. However, despite the importance of relative permeability parameters as inputs to reservoir simulation tools used to predict and optimise the economic viability of CSG resource developments (Clarkson et al, 2011) there remains a large gap between relative permeability parameters measured in controlled laboratory experiments and those derived from field data (Chen et al, 2013;Meaney and Paterson, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%