2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.dt.2020.05.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relative performance of novel blast wave mitigation system to conventional system based on mitigation percent criteria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it is appropriate to measure the local perforating destructive probability (ProbLP) of debris clouds by the size of the perforation area (Area FC ) they cause on the compart-ment of a spatial target and its related parameters in the full digital simulation. Furthermore, referring to a previous study [16], we create the following evaluation model of Prob LP .…”
Section: Local Perforating Destructive Probabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, it is appropriate to measure the local perforating destructive probability (ProbLP) of debris clouds by the size of the perforation area (Area FC ) they cause on the compart-ment of a spatial target and its related parameters in the full digital simulation. Furthermore, referring to a previous study [16], we create the following evaluation model of Prob LP .…”
Section: Local Perforating Destructive Probabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the specific impulse per unit area I SP (MA) generated by debris clouds can be taken as a measure of the tearing destructive probability (Prob TF ). In the full digital simulation, it is assumed that the large-area tearing destructive effect of debris clouds is like its strong shockwave effect; accordingly, we can create the following evaluation model of Prob TF by referring to the strong shockwave destructive criterion [16].…”
Section: Tearing Destructive Probabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, in this subsection, comparison of the proposed to three existing schemes is provided. In particular: (a) the complexity of the proposed scheme is compared to the complexity of a linear scheme [69], where the concept of omni-directional propagation of the blast wave is presented, (b) the threat notification time of the proposed scheme is compared to the one presented in [70], where sensors/cameras are mounted along the perimeter fence of a CI and (c) the estimated surveillance equipment cost of the proposed scheme is compared to the cost of [71], where surveillance of the area of a CI is accomplished by a grid of sensors.…”
Section: Comparison To Other Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the linear case (omni-directional wave propagation), the threat is estimated for all cpbs, irrespectively of their distance from the blast. Figure 12 illustrates complexity of the proposed scheme and of [69] for a random selection of 300 different time instances (300 instances of possible explosion). As it can be observed, the proposed method reduces computational complexity compared to the linear approach.…”
Section: Figure 12mentioning
confidence: 99%