1992
DOI: 10.1519/1533-4287(1992)006<0200:rmepaa>2.3.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relative Muscular Endurance Performance as a Predictor of Bench Press Strength in College Men and Women

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
59
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
59
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies have shown that the relationship, however, can be affected by training conditions, gender, and inter-individual differences (Braith et al 1993;Mayhew et al 1992;Mayhew et al 1995). Sakamoto and Sinclair (2006) further reported that the relationship was affected by lifting velocity, with faster speeds producing greater numbers of repetitions at given intensities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have shown that the relationship, however, can be affected by training conditions, gender, and inter-individual differences (Braith et al 1993;Mayhew et al 1992;Mayhew et al 1995). Sakamoto and Sinclair (2006) further reported that the relationship was affected by lifting velocity, with faster speeds producing greater numbers of repetitions at given intensities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approaches for determining the N-RM reported in literature [7,15] are based on statistical derived equations for a certain population derived from extensive experimental investigations. The so-obtained equations are valid for the whole investigated population, but for one individual the error between computed and experimentally determined N-RM The linear regression analysis with a high positive correlation coefficient of 0.93 supports the proposed approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance the model used in Ref. [7,14] is of the form b 1 ¼ 41:9, b 2 ¼ 0:055). However differences (b 0 and b 2 are within one standard deviation) can be observed, which are mainly due to the different exercise considered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The multiple repetition maximum test involved three to four sets of progressively increasing weight while attempting to complete between 6 and 8 repetitions (actual range 3-10) before failure or an inability to maintain correct technique on the final set. 1RM strength was predicted from the number of repetitions and weight for the final set using the previously validated equation of Mayhew et al: 35 predicted 1RM = (100 × weight)÷(52.2+(41.9 − 0.055 × no. of repetitions )).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%