2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-2681(01)00145-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relative-income effects on subjective well-being in the cross-section

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

20
382
4
18

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 673 publications
(424 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
20
382
4
18
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to an obvious point that someone with little concern for status is not likely to become a CEO in the first place, there is also evidence direct evidence supporting this point. 4 This is also consistent with survey findings that wealthier people tend to care more about status (McBride (2001), Dynan and Ravina (2007)). Second, our approach to modelling status concerns is supported by extensive research on organizational economics initiated by the influential work of Cyert and March (1963).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…In addition to an obvious point that someone with little concern for status is not likely to become a CEO in the first place, there is also evidence direct evidence supporting this point. 4 This is also consistent with survey findings that wealthier people tend to care more about status (McBride (2001), Dynan and Ravina (2007)). Second, our approach to modelling status concerns is supported by extensive research on organizational economics initiated by the influential work of Cyert and March (1963).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Specifically, we use two proxies for economic status: a) a self-assessed question on financial situation (using a survey question of: "How would you describe the economic situation of your household at present time? ", with five response categories ranging from Very bad to Very good), which has been found in previous work to perform better than self-reported income in these countries (Balabanova, et al, 2012; and more general contexts (McBride, 2001;Mentzakis & Moro, 2009) and b) a wealth index composed of responses to 10 questions on possessing certain objects or comforts (i.e. fridge, TV, washing machine (not automatic), mobile telephone, computer, car produced before 2005, automatic washing machine, home cinema, dishwasher and car made since 2005).…”
Section: Adjustment For Confoundingmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…As for socio-demographic control variables, we employ standard regressors from well-being regressions (e.g., McBride 2001;Stutzer 2004;Dolan et al 2008;Bjoernskov et al 2008;Di Tella et al 2003) to proxy the age of the respondent, marital status, labor and educational status, subjective health, and the beforementioned attitudinal characteristics. As for their precise definition, we stay in line with Bruni and Stanca (2006) and refer to table A.2 in the appendix for details.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%