2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.06.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relative importance of individual insurance status and hospital payer mix on survival for women with cervical cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Patel et al conducted a study in California and reported that patients with Medicaid, insurance granted by the state, or those without any medical insurance had a higher incidence of cervical cancer [22], which coincides with the results of our research. Another study in the United States showed that Medicaid patients had a 38% increase in mortality (HR = 1.38; CI 95% 1.34-1.43), while uninsured patients had a 32% increase (HR = 1.32; CI 95%, 1.26-1.38), which may be associated with lower quality of care and reduced adherence to medical protocols in public hospitals [23]. On the other hand, the report on the situation of cancer in Colombia in 2021 reported that the incidence of cervical cancer was similar for both the contributory and subsidized regimes [24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patel et al conducted a study in California and reported that patients with Medicaid, insurance granted by the state, or those without any medical insurance had a higher incidence of cervical cancer [22], which coincides with the results of our research. Another study in the United States showed that Medicaid patients had a 38% increase in mortality (HR = 1.38; CI 95% 1.34-1.43), while uninsured patients had a 32% increase (HR = 1.32; CI 95%, 1.26-1.38), which may be associated with lower quality of care and reduced adherence to medical protocols in public hospitals [23]. On the other hand, the report on the situation of cancer in Colombia in 2021 reported that the incidence of cervical cancer was similar for both the contributory and subsidized regimes [24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, given that this study excluded patients who were not enrolled in a health insurance plan for at least 3 consecutive years to accurately capture screening history, uninsured patients and those with inconsecutive enrollment were excluded. Given that uninsured status is associated with decreased cervical cancer screening, advanced stage at diagnosis, and decreased survival, [22][23][24][25] screening uptake and survival outcomes of uninsured patients in PR should be evaluated in future studies. Nonetheless, it is important to highlight that less than 10% of the population of PR is uninsured, and that the Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (BCCEDP) 26 in PR currently offers screening services to the uninsured population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%