2005
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2255827
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relative Importance and Value

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
55
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…e.g. , Feldman 2005) that the lmg contribution of a regressor with coefficient 0 can be positive, if this regressor is correlated with one or more strong contributors. Feldman considers this as a disadvantage of the lmg allocations.…”
Section: Computer-intensive Relative Importance Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…e.g. , Feldman 2005) that the lmg contribution of a regressor with coefficient 0 can be positive, if this regressor is correlated with one or more strong contributors. Feldman considers this as a disadvantage of the lmg allocations.…”
Section: Computer-intensive Relative Importance Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that formula (8) is not used for computation; there is a more efficient computation approach that exploits a game-theoretic background of pmvd (cf. Feldman 2005). Regarding the weights in formula (8), Feldman's (2005) idea was to use the sequences…”
Section: Computer-intensive Relative Importance Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Because covariance can introduce bias [8] with standardized coefficient other more robust techniques were developed to identify the contribution of each predictors to R 2 . proportional marginal variance decomposition (PMVD) [9] is one such metric and according to this indicator, 53% Fig. 4.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%