Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2004
DOI: 10.1117/12.536733
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relative impact of detector noise and anatomical structure on lung nodule detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many investigators [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] have shown that it is not the system (including quantum) noise that is the limiting factor in chest radiography, but rather the projected patient anatomy or "anatomical noise". It therefore follows that any images used to optimise a digital radiographic system for chest radiography must contain clinically realistic anatomical features and noise.…”
Section: Advances In Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many investigators [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] have shown that it is not the system (including quantum) noise that is the limiting factor in chest radiography, but rather the projected patient anatomy or "anatomical noise". It therefore follows that any images used to optimise a digital radiographic system for chest radiography must contain clinically realistic anatomical features and noise.…”
Section: Advances In Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many investigators [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] have shown that projected patient anatomy is the limiting factor in chest radiography rather than system (including quantum) noise, and the term ''anatomical noise'' was derived from their work. It therefore follows that any images used to optimise a digital X-ray system for chest radiography must contain clinically realistic anatomical noise.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In parallel with this technical revolution, demands on the management of radiation for medical use were expressed, first by the recommendations issued by the ICRP in ICRP 73 (14) and then by the stricter legislation in the European Medical Exposure Directive (65) . Furthermore, research at the time showed the limited validity of basing optimisation on traditional signal-to-noise ratio measurements (52,56,(66)(67)(68)(69)(70)(71)(72)(73)(74) , which previously had been common. This combination of a new technical era, new recommendations and directives, and a paradigm shift in the view on image quality measurements, provided the motivation for the development of a conceptual optimisation strategy in a digital environment, presented in Paper I.…”
Section: A Conceptual Optimisation Strategy For Radiography In a Digimentioning
confidence: 99%