2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2019.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relative fibular strength and locomotor behavior in KNM-WT 15000 and OH 35

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 121 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of the sample (94%) was wild‐caught, although a total of 21 macaques across all developmental stages were captive. Although studies have found significant differences in cross‐sectional geometric properties between captive and wild apes (Canington et al, 2018; Venkataraman et al, 2013), others have found few or none in lemurs (Demes & Jungers, 1993), macaques (Burr et al, 1989) and apes (Marchi, 2007; Marchi et al, 2019; Morimoto et al, 2011). To decide whether the captive macaques should be included for analysis, the dispersion of wild and captive macaque circularity ( I max / I min ) was compared at the humeral and femoral midshafts, due to their locomotor adaptive capacities.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most of the sample (94%) was wild‐caught, although a total of 21 macaques across all developmental stages were captive. Although studies have found significant differences in cross‐sectional geometric properties between captive and wild apes (Canington et al, 2018; Venkataraman et al, 2013), others have found few or none in lemurs (Demes & Jungers, 1993), macaques (Burr et al, 1989) and apes (Marchi, 2007; Marchi et al, 2019; Morimoto et al, 2011). To decide whether the captive macaques should be included for analysis, the dispersion of wild and captive macaque circularity ( I max / I min ) was compared at the humeral and femoral midshafts, due to their locomotor adaptive capacities.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use ratios of second moments of area (bending rigidities) about the principal and anatomical axes to measure crosssectional circularity (Ohman, 1993), while geometric morphometric analyses are used to study variation in cross-sectional shape and form (Klingenberg & Monteiro, 2005;Slice, 2007;Zelditch et al, 2012). A GM approach also accounts for size differences in relation to shape, as analyses can be used to scale an object's dimensions by its centroid in order to consider all aspects of its shape together (Zelditch et al, 2012 (Canington et al, 2018;Venkataraman et al, 2013), others have found few or none in lemurs (Demes & Jungers, 1993), macaques (Burr et al, 1989) and apes (Marchi, 2007;Marchi et al, 2019;Morimoto et al, 2011 The captive and wild adult humeri did not vary significantly in either comparison (KS: p = 0.356; MW: p = 0.409), so the captive macaques were included in the general sample.…”
Section: Postcranial Development and Adaptationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fibular robusticity (Z p ‐std) depends on age, and this is especially true in the middle part of the fibula. Thus, comparative analyses could be significantly altered given that this part is the only region currently used in paleoanthropological studies (e.g., Marchi et al, 2019; Sparacello et al, 2014). Such phenomena can be considered and discussed by authors based on the sample used and the period to which it belongs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reconstructing mobility is a key point in human evolution (Carlson & Marchi, 2014). Recently, fibular bone has been included in functional studies of past populations through assessments of cross‐sectional geometric properties (CSGs) and fibular furrows (Hagihara & Nara, 2016; Marchi, Harper, Chirchir, & Ruff, 2019; Sparacello et al, 2018; Sparacello, Marchi, & Shaw, 2014). However, little is known about the structural changes in the fibula that occur during aging (e.g., Allen, Johnstone, Rice, & Marsh, 2011; McNeil, Raymer, Doherty, Marsh, & Rice, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation