2010
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.81.060104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relative entropy as a universal metric for multiscale errors

Abstract: We show that the relative entropy, Srel, suggests a fundamental indicator of the success of multiscale studies, in which coarse-grained (CG) models are linked to first-principles (FP) ones. We demonstrate that Srel inherently measures fluctuations in the differences between CG and FP potential energy landscapes, and develop a theory that tightly and generally links it to errors associated with coarse graining. We consider two simple case studies substantiating these results, and suggest that Srel has important… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
119
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
4
119
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The disadvantage of IMC on the other hand is a high computational cost and problems with numerical stability; for a detailed comparison see Reference [116]. Related to IMC, there are several other recent developments, e.g., a molecular renormalization group approach [85][86][87] or an approach that relies on relative entropies [96][97][98] (which will be discussed in more detail below). While the above structure-based methods by construction reproduce exactly, within the error of the numerical procedure, the local pair structures and thus are well-suited to the reinsertion of atomistic coordinates, it can be expected a priori that they will not be equally well suited to the reproduction of thermodynamic properties (pressure, phase behavior, etc.)…”
Section: Boltzmann-inversion Based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The disadvantage of IMC on the other hand is a high computational cost and problems with numerical stability; for a detailed comparison see Reference [116]. Related to IMC, there are several other recent developments, e.g., a molecular renormalization group approach [85][86][87] or an approach that relies on relative entropies [96][97][98] (which will be discussed in more detail below). While the above structure-based methods by construction reproduce exactly, within the error of the numerical procedure, the local pair structures and thus are well-suited to the reinsertion of atomistic coordinates, it can be expected a priori that they will not be equally well suited to the reproduction of thermodynamic properties (pressure, phase behavior, etc.)…”
Section: Boltzmann-inversion Based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another group of approaches, one numerically generates CG interaction functions with the aim of reproducing the configurational phase space sampled in an atomistic reference simulation. These approaches may rely on different types of reference properties such as structure functions [77][78][79][80][81][82][83][84][85][86][87][88][89], mean forces [90][91][92][93][94][95] or relative entropies [96][97][98]. In the following subsection, a few basic notions of coarse-graining theory will be introduced, together with examples of the strategies that can be employed to perform the coarse-graining in practice.…”
Section: Coarse-grainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…46 Our design of CAMELOT is guided by the successes of previous methods that include the force-matching algorithm of Voth and coworkers, [47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58] the Yvon-Born-Green formalism of Noid and coworkers, [59][60][61] and the relative entropy method of Shell and coworkers. [62][63][64] The remainder of the text is organized as follows: Section II describes the CAMELOT algorithm. Section III describes the numerical methods we use for all atom and coarsegrained simulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5][6][7] However, forcefields with an even coarser representation of molecular components have arisen from the desire to model larger systems than those that are manageable with an allatom representation. [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] Similarly, implicit solvent models aim to reduce computational demand by replacing the explicitly sampled solvent degrees of freedom with an approximate, continuum description of the bulk solvent potential of mean force (PMF). Implicit solvent models are commonly used at all levels of molecular granularity, from QM (Refs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%