1989
DOI: 10.1016/0022-4049(89)90014-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relative ends and duality groups

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
69
0
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
69
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The notion of ends of pairs of groups appeared first in papers by Houghton [23] and Scott [48]. A variant of the idea of ends relative to a subgroup was introduced by Kropholler and Roller in [31]. Here we use the name coends for Krophollers and Rollers concept and use the following reformulation, due to Bowditch [4], as a definition.…”
Section: Definition 10mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The notion of ends of pairs of groups appeared first in papers by Houghton [23] and Scott [48]. A variant of the idea of ends relative to a subgroup was introduced by Kropholler and Roller in [31]. Here we use the name coends for Krophollers and Rollers concept and use the following reformulation, due to Bowditch [4], as a definition.…”
Section: Definition 10mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See [13] for examples. The end invariantẽ(G, H) mentioned above is a generalisation of Scott's end invariant and was introduced by Kropholler and Roller, [7], in their study of the algebraic torus theorem for Poincaré duality groups. We will state the definition ofẽ(G, H) in Section 1, but note here that in particular if e(G, H) 2 thenẽ(G, H) 2 as required.…”
Section: Theoremmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In factẽ(G, H ) is closely related to e(G, H ). For instance, in [13], Kropholler Recall that a subset of G is said to be H -finite if it is contained in finitely many cosets Hg, and that this condition is equivalent to the subset being contained in some uniform neighborhood of H . We say that a subset is H -infinite if it is not H -finite.…”
Section: Definition 81 Ifmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 Let G and H be as in Theorem 4.3. Then for any subgroup H 1 of H and any infinite index subgroup K of H 1 , e(G, K ) = 1.…”
Section: Theorem 811mentioning
confidence: 99%