2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0272-7714(03)00075-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relative efficiencies of different filters in retaining phytoplankton for pigment and productivity studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
37
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In our view, these differences likely reflect filtering artifacts resulting from cell lysis, the incomplete retention of cells by GF/F filters, or both. Inefficient retention of cells or chlorophyll by GF/F filters (at times exceeding 50%) has been observed (Dickson and Wheeler 1993;Knefelkamp et al 2007;Nayar and Chou 2003;Stockner et al 1990;Taguchi and Laws 1988), although other studies report few, if any, problems (Chavez et al 1995). This discrepancy may be due to filter brand or differential treatment (e.g., precombustion temperature or duration) or filtration volume impacting the effective pore size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our view, these differences likely reflect filtering artifacts resulting from cell lysis, the incomplete retention of cells by GF/F filters, or both. Inefficient retention of cells or chlorophyll by GF/F filters (at times exceeding 50%) has been observed (Dickson and Wheeler 1993;Knefelkamp et al 2007;Nayar and Chou 2003;Stockner et al 1990;Taguchi and Laws 1988), although other studies report few, if any, problems (Chavez et al 1995). This discrepancy may be due to filter brand or differential treatment (e.g., precombustion temperature or duration) or filtration volume impacting the effective pore size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently melt-water salinity was measured (ice core salinity) and subsamples were filtered through previously combusted (400°C for 4 h) GF/F filters before freezing at −20°C. The effective pore size of GF/F filters decreases to 0.2 μm with the precombustion process reducing the particle cutoff size to 0.2 μm, thus making filters suitable for measurement of dissolved parameters (51,52).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For analysis of properties of DOM, a portion of sample water was filtered through pre-combusted (450 • C for 4 h) 0.7 µm GF/F (Whatman). The nominal pore size of GF/F filters decreases with the pre-combustion process reducing the particle cutoff size, thus making the selected filter more suitable for measurement of dissolved parameters (Nayar and Chou 2003;Hulatt and Thomas 2010). A subset of these GF/F filtered samples for colored dissolved organic matter (CDOM) and fluorescent dissolved organic matter (FDOM) were stored in acid-washed (10 % HCl) and pre-combusted glass vials at 4 • C until absorbance and fluorescence measurements were made within two weeks from sampling.…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%