1995
DOI: 10.1093/ee/24.4.909
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relative Effects of Plant Resistance and Natural Enemies by Plant Developmental Age on Sawfly (Hymenoptera: Tenthredinidae) Preference and Performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ovipositing females should be favored by natural selection so as to lay eggs on plant species or parts on which offspring fitness is maximized (Thompson 1988). This advantage should be particularly true for insects immobile during the larval period, such as leaf miners, in which adult oviposition mainly determines larval feeding sites (Valladares and Lawton 1991;Auerbach and Alberts 1992;Stein and Price 1995). Therefore, we expect a positive correlation between preference and performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Ovipositing females should be favored by natural selection so as to lay eggs on plant species or parts on which offspring fitness is maximized (Thompson 1988). This advantage should be particularly true for insects immobile during the larval period, such as leaf miners, in which adult oviposition mainly determines larval feeding sites (Valladares and Lawton 1991;Auerbach and Alberts 1992;Stein and Price 1995). Therefore, we expect a positive correlation between preference and performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The Plant Vigor Hypothesis (PVH; Price 1991) predicts that insect herbivores will choose preferentially large, more vigorously growing plants or plant modules and that offspring performance will be greater on these more vigorous plants or plant modules. Its predictions have been widely tested in diverse ecosystems around the world, being either fully supported (Price et al 1987a, b;Craig et al 1989;Kimberling et al 1990; Price and Ohgushi 1995;Stein and Price 1995;Woods et al 1996;Carr et al 1998;Inbar et al 2001;de Bruyn et al 2002), partially supported (Cornelissen et al 1997;Prado and Vieira 1999;Cornelissen and Fernandes 2001c;Fritz et al 2000;Ferrier andPrice 2004), or refuted (de Bruyn 1995;Faria and Fernandes 2001;Rehill and Schultz 2001). Faria and Fernandes (2001) argued that the amount of resources has been generally underestimated in large size class shoots.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers frequently measure the association (phenotypic or genetic) between the oviposition preference of females and the performance of their offspring. If there is a positive association between adult oviposition preference and the performance of offspring, compelling ecological and evolutionary stories can be told (Rausher, 1982;Via, 1986;Singer et al, 1988;Bossart & Scriber, 1995;Stein & Price, 1995;Gu et al, 2001), but the scenarios are more complicated when no concordance is found (Courtney, 1981;Thompson, 1988;Fox, 1993;Janz et al, 1994;Berdegue et al, 1998;Gratton & Welter, 1998;Leyva et al, 2000). In these cases, finding an ecologically or evolutionarily plausible explanation for the observed patterns of adult preference and juvenile performance can be daunting, but potentially revealing of what ecological processes are involved and might drive evolution in natural populations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%