Relative Effectiveness of Three Modes of Delayed Sidetone Presentation

Winchester, Richard; Gibbons, Edward W.

doi:10.1001/archotol.1957.03830210073011

Cited by 9 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…There is some empirical evidence relating to this problem. Winchester and Gibbons (1957) found that monaural DAF without masking of the other ear produced less disturbance than monaural delay with masking of the other ear. However, Chase and Guilfoyle (1962) presented delayed and undelayed feedback simultaneously to both ears.…”

Section: Daf and Stammeringmentioning

confidence: 94%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Delayed auditory feedback.

Yates¹

1963

Psychological Bulletin

283

142

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

When S hears his own voice with a small time delay his speech may be seriously affected. The effects produced by delayed auditory feedback (DAF) include prolongation of vowels, repetition of consonants, increased intensity of utterance, and other articulatory changes. The significance of individual differences in susceptibility to DAF is considered in relation to personality and physiological characteristics. The technique may prove useful in the detection of auditory malingering and has possible implications for the understanding of stammering. The discussion relates the findings to models of speech control. Methodological problems and future research needs are outlined. (74 ref.)

show abstract

Section: Daf and Stammeringmentioning

confidence: 94%

“…In addition to the two major independent variables, Winchester and Gibbons (1957) contrasted various modes of presentation of DAF. With constant delay and intensity level, they presented DAF binaurally; uniaurally but without masking of the other ear; uniaurally but with the other ear masked; and without feedback or masking.…”

Section: Intensity Of Feedbackmentioning

confidence: 99%