Statistics for Social Science and Behavorial Sciences 1999
DOI: 10.1007/b97852
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relative Distribution Methods in the Social Sciences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, all these measures provide a single effect size estimate that may not be very informative or could even be misleading with regard to the possible complex differences between two distributions 23,35,36 . To fully represent and compare distributions, robust statistical and informatively-rich graphical methods such as the cumulative distribution function (CDF) 25 and the shiftfunction 23,24 are required 23,25,[36][37][38][39] . Consequently, we used these methods to provide two complementary perspectives 23 of the multivariate sex differences in GMVOL.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, all these measures provide a single effect size estimate that may not be very informative or could even be misleading with regard to the possible complex differences between two distributions 23,35,36 . To fully represent and compare distributions, robust statistical and informatively-rich graphical methods such as the cumulative distribution function (CDF) 25 and the shiftfunction 23,24 are required 23,25,[36][37][38][39] . Consequently, we used these methods to provide two complementary perspectives 23 of the multivariate sex differences in GMVOL.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because no single score can properly summarize the differences between two distributions 23,25,[35][36][37][38][39] , male-female differences in the PCAM continuum were characterized by comparing their cumulative distribution functions (CDF; 25,35 ). CDFs make it possible to directly estimate the proportion of cases in each group with PCAM values equal to or lower than any possible cutoff, but also the proportion of subjects in one group have PCAM values equal or lower than a given proportion of cases in another group 25,35 .…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cells were then clustered under a graph-based approach by first identifying K-nearest neighbors in PCA space, and then clustering under a Louvain algorithm with a resolution of 0.1. Gini coefficients were calculated using the gini() function that is available in the reldist v1.6-6 package 127,128 using RNA expression values obtained with the Seurat function AverageExpression(). Differential gene expression testing was performed using DESeq2 v.1.40.2 122 with a likelihood-ratio test to identify distinct genes among the D1-MSN clusters.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resulting p -values were adjusted using the Bonferroni correction based on the number of genes identified in each cluster. Gini coefficients were calculated using the average log23-normalized gene expression values for each cluster with the gini() command from the reldist R package 87,88 . All R code is available at https://gitlab.rc.uab.edu/day-lab.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%