2013
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0000729
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relative Displacement Sensing Techniques for Postevent Structural Damage Assessment: Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Geodetic monitoring of displacements of damaged buildings is often the most effective method of investigating the causes of their cracks and failures [1][2][3]. This approach can give satisfactory results also in the case of damage having a geotechnical background.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geodetic monitoring of displacements of damaged buildings is often the most effective method of investigating the causes of their cracks and failures [1][2][3]. This approach can give satisfactory results also in the case of damage having a geotechnical background.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A feature point-matching algorithm was used to recognize ceiling objects and calculate the relative movement between the ceiling and floor. A more comprehensive collection of different kinds of technologies used in relative displacement monitoring is presented in two literature reviews [11,18]. However, the above methods have disadvantages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The premise of this paper is that appropriately identified and processed acceleration data could be used to assess structural damage in the aftermath of an earthquake. In particular, the acceleration data can be integrated twice to yield floor displacements, which can be further processed to get interstory drift ratios along the building height (Li et al). Comparing interstory drift ratio to well‐known limits (eg, in FEMA 350 (2000)) can provide insight into the damage that the building has experienced.…”
Section: Motivation and Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%