2017
DOI: 10.1017/s1474748017000391
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relative Cycles With Moduli and Regulator Maps

Abstract: Let X be a separated scheme of finite type over a field k and D a non-reduced effective Cartier divisor on it. We attach to the pair (X, D) a cycle complex with modulus, those homotopy groups -called higher Chow groups with modulus -generalize additive higher Chow groups of Bloch-Esnault, Rülling, Park and Krishna-Levine, and that sheafified on X Zar gives a candidate definition for a relative motivic complex of the pair, that we compute in weight 1.When X is smooth over k and D is such that D red is a normal … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
106
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
106
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Remark 2.9. For effective modulus pairs, the above definition coincides with the one introduced by Binda-Saito in [6]. The case q ≥ 1 is by definition.…”
Section: Inclusions: δmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Remark 2.9. For effective modulus pairs, the above definition coincides with the one introduced by Binda-Saito in [6]. The case q ≥ 1 is by definition.…”
Section: Inclusions: δmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Remark 5.9. When X is effective, the relative motivic cohomology is introduced in [6]. If moreover X • is smooth, the relative motivic cohomology is contravariantly functorial with respect to coadmissible left fine (not necessarily flat) morphisms of modulus pairs ( [8]).…”
Section: A Results On Relative Motivic Cohomologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When D red is a strict normal crossing divisor, the complex j ! (Z) → I D → Ω 1 (X,D) is used in [5] to construct a universal regular quotient of CH 0 (X|D) deg 0 . One consequence of Proposition 8.1 is that it provides a cohomological proof that the Albanese variety with modulus of § 8.2.1 coincides with the one constructed in [5] when X is a surface and D red is strict normal crossing.…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Explicitely, this is given as follows (see [14, §5.2]). Let X Y be a proper C-curve that is obtained by collapsing Y into a single (usually singular) point (see [26,Chapter IV,[3][4]). Let G(X, Y ) be the generalized Jacobian of X with modulus Y in the sense of Rosenlicht-Serre [26], or, which amounts to the same, the Picard scheme Pic 0 (X Y ) of X Y .…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%