Sexual conflict is often associated with arms race dynamics, which can lead to enhancement of traits involved in the conflict or their replacement with new traits that are more effective in securing reproductive interests of their bearers (Brockhurst et al., 2014; Rowe, Chenoweth, & Agrawal, 2018). Such dynamics result in a series of selective sweeps at one or more loci (Rowe et al., 2018) or generate positive selection in a group of molecules of similar function (Swanson, Clark, Waldrip-Dail, Wolfner, & Aquadro, 2001). In theory, however, sexual conflict could also promote polymorphism at the underlying genes (Brockhurst et al., 2014; Rowe et al., 2018). Such polymorphism could increase the potential of a population to respond to environmental change, which often initially relies on standing genetic variation (Barrett & Schluter, 2008). Yet, processes driving polymorphism in genes involved in sexual conflict received far less attention compared to those leading to escalatory arms race. One mechanism potentially maintaining polymorphism in genes involved in sexual conflict is negative frequency-dependent selection, resulting from Red-Queen dynamics analogous to antagonistic coevolution between hosts and parasites (Brockhurst et al., 2014; Rowe et al., 2018). Another potential mechanism involves negative pleiotropy (Zajitschek & Connallon, 2018), where a trait beneficial to male competitiveness is associated with detrimental pleiotropic effects on other fitness components. For example, in the soay sheep, a gene causing expression of enlarged horns, a trait beneficial to male reproductive success, has a negative pleiotropic effect on survival (Johnston et al., 2013). However, this sexually selected trait does not seem to be involved in sexual conflict.