2012
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2745.12014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relative contributions of plant traits and soil microbial properties to mountain grassland ecosystem services

Abstract: Summary 1. Plant functional diversity and soil microbial community composition are tightly coupled. Changes in these interactions may influence ecosystem functioning. Links between plant functional diversity, soil microbial communities and ecosystem functioning have been demonstrated in experiments using plant monocultures and mixtures, using broad plant and microbial functional groups, but have not been examined in diverse natural plant communities. 2. We quantified the relative effects of plant and microbial… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

24
316
4
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 280 publications
(354 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
24
316
4
3
Order By: Relevance
“…3 for species codes turn could rank grass species along gradients, such as from conservative-strategy to acquisitive one with, respectively, deep and coarse root system or shallow and thin root system (Fort et al 2013), or also could discriminate for drought tolerance (Craine et al 2012) or dehydration avoidance (Zwicke et al 2015). Going further on roots traits appears also promising in order to better understand below-ground processes as shown by recent studies (see Ke et al 2015;Legay et al 2014;Grigulis et al 2013). …”
Section: From Empirical To Predictive Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 for species codes turn could rank grass species along gradients, such as from conservative-strategy to acquisitive one with, respectively, deep and coarse root system or shallow and thin root system (Fort et al 2013), or also could discriminate for drought tolerance (Craine et al 2012) or dehydration avoidance (Zwicke et al 2015). Going further on roots traits appears also promising in order to better understand below-ground processes as shown by recent studies (see Ke et al 2015;Legay et al 2014;Grigulis et al 2013). …”
Section: From Empirical To Predictive Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the cold and, in some instances, dry climate, nitrogen is one of the most limiting elements for plants and soil microorganisms in subalpine grasslands, and thereby for carbon and nitrogen cycling (15,21,22). In our models, EPs were driven by two core sets of variables relating to fertility and plant traits, respectively (Fig.…”
Section: Functional Mechanisms Underpinning Scenario Effects On Eps Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). Using semimechanistic models of ecosystem properties (EPs) based on plant and microbial functional traits (8), we simulate the impacts of combined climate and land-use changes on ESs (14,15).Using data from a grassland-dominated landscape in the French Alps, we analyzed the responses to four plausible scenarios of a set of EPs (8) identified by stakeholders as contributing to locally important ESs such as water quality, aesthetic value, and fodder quality and quantity (16).Considering that changes in ESs at the landscape scale result from changes in the landscape-scale patterns in management and their plot-scale effects on biodiversity and ecosystem functioning, we used an empirical model: (i) to predict the potential effects of climate change on the supply of individual ESs and on their bundles, both directly or indirectly through land-management adaptation; (ii) to quantify the relative contributions of direct and indirect climate effects on individual ESs and their bundles; and (iii) to identify the underpinning mechanisms involved. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, most of the studies focusing on the relationship between FTD and C stocks did not consider the whole plant coordination and root traits are particularly ignored due to technical difficulties and are often substituted by measurement of leaf functional traits (Conti and Diaz, 2013;Cavanaugh et al, 2014;Finegan et al, 2015). It is recommended to include root traits, in addition to leaf and stem traits, in further studies concerning FTD and C stocks in natural forest ecosystems (Orwin et al, 2010;Grigulis et al, 2013). Because, root traits have been recognized to have more direct ecosystem effects (Butterfield and Suding, 2013) and may not always be well associated with leaf traits (Orwin et al, 2010;Fortunel et al, 2012).…”
Section: Role Of the Plant Economics Spectrum In Ftd-carbon Stocks Rementioning
confidence: 99%