Physical Modelling in Geotechnics 2018
DOI: 10.1201/9780429438646-62
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relative contribution of drainage capacity of stone columns as a countermeasure against liquefaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, the use of drains (of various types) as mitigation against the effects of liquefaction is the subject of several papers. Paramasivam et al (2018), García-Torres et al 2018, Marques et al 2018and Kirkwood & Dashti (2018) all consider the use of vertical drains whilst Apostolou et al (2018) consider the use of stone columns although their tests did not represent structural loads but rather, investigated dissipation of excess pore water pressures within the soil model. Finally, although not strictly speaking a ground improvement technique, Nigorikawa et al (2018) describe a base isolation system as a mechanism to mitigate liquefaction effects.…”
Section: Ground Improvementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the use of drains (of various types) as mitigation against the effects of liquefaction is the subject of several papers. Paramasivam et al (2018), García-Torres et al 2018, Marques et al 2018and Kirkwood & Dashti (2018) all consider the use of vertical drains whilst Apostolou et al (2018) consider the use of stone columns although their tests did not represent structural loads but rather, investigated dissipation of excess pore water pressures within the soil model. Finally, although not strictly speaking a ground improvement technique, Nigorikawa et al (2018) describe a base isolation system as a mechanism to mitigate liquefaction effects.…”
Section: Ground Improvementmentioning
confidence: 99%