2006
DOI: 10.1002/jps.20495
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relative bioavailability estimation of carbamazepine crystal forms using an artificial stomach-duodenum model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
95
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(21 reference statements)
2
95
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The different performances in both tests that might be attributed to the dynamic conditions presented some difficulty in choosing a more predictive in vitro test. The exposures of dissolved drug in ASD fluid have been successfully used to rank order systemic AUC and C max for several carbamazepine products (39). Therefore, adopting the same method, we could predict the rank order of in vivo AUC and C max for these tablets as HSWG>RCS=RCD, which was consistent with the clinical observation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…The different performances in both tests that might be attributed to the dynamic conditions presented some difficulty in choosing a more predictive in vitro test. The exposures of dissolved drug in ASD fluid have been successfully used to rank order systemic AUC and C max for several carbamazepine products (39). Therefore, adopting the same method, we could predict the rank order of in vivo AUC and C max for these tablets as HSWG>RCS=RCD, which was consistent with the clinical observation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…On account of many factors such as crystal habit, size and even polymorphic forms of a drug, dissolution rates would enhance through habit recrystallization. A number of reports in the literature validated the effects of crystal morphology variation on solubility, in vitro dissolution rate, holding potentials for improving drug bioavailability (Kawashima et al, 1986;Carino et al, 2006). Several studies in this filed have shown that exposure of diverse crystal faces determines the nature of the wettability and consequent enhancements in dissolution rate of the drugs with different crystalline shapes (Heng et al, 2006).…”
Section: Solubility Dissolution and Bioavailability Of Drugsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…This shows the significant progress that has been made since the first compendial dissolution test (USP I apparatus) was introduced in 1970 Consequently, to mimic and more closely reflect the possible in vivo dosage form surface exposure, have reliable dissolution data and be able to discriminate between release behaviour of various modified release formulations, it is therefore important that we gain a better understanding of the role of hydrodynamics in relation to delivery system and release mechanisms necessary for the development of alternative dissolution methods [136,137]. The other two compendial dissolution apparatuses are the USP III (reciprocating cylinder, Bio-Dis) and IV (flow-through cell) which offer the advantages of determining release from the dosage form under various, consecutive conditions simulating the GI physiology.…”
Section: Dissolution Apparatusesmentioning
confidence: 99%