1997
DOI: 10.1007/bf02392743
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relative algebraic K-theory and topological cyclic homology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
97
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
5
97
0
Order By: Relevance
“…B] that the mapping fiber of the cyclotomic trace map K(X) → {TC n (X; p)} satisfies descent for the cdh-topology on the category of schemes essentially of finite type over an infinite perfect field k of positive characteristic p, provided that the resolution of singularities holds over k. The main advantage of the functor {TC n q (−; p)} that appears in the statement of Theorems B and D in comparison to the functor TC q (−; p) that appears in McCarthy's theorem [23] is that the former preserves filtered colimits while the latter, in general, does not. Therefore, replacing the latter functor by the former, the methods of sheaf cohomology become available.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…B] that the mapping fiber of the cyclotomic trace map K(X) → {TC n (X; p)} satisfies descent for the cdh-topology on the category of schemes essentially of finite type over an infinite perfect field k of positive characteristic p, provided that the resolution of singularities holds over k. The main advantage of the functor {TC n q (−; p)} that appears in the statement of Theorems B and D in comparison to the functor TC q (−; p) that appears in McCarthy's theorem [23] is that the former preserves filtered colimits while the latter, in general, does not. Therefore, replacing the latter functor by the former, the methods of sheaf cohomology become available.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, as we explain in Theorem 4.1 below, results of McCarthy [28] and of Geisser and the author [10] implies that the righthand square, too, is homotopy cartesian. Hence, the mapping fiber K(A, a) of the map of K-theory spectra induced by h is canonically weakly equivalent to the mapping fiber of the map of topological cyclic homology spectra induced by f .…”
Section: K(a) K(a)mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…We first use the comparison theorems between K-theory and topological cyclic homology proved by McCarthy [28] and by Geisser and the author [10,11] to prove the following general result. Theorem 4.1.…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It follows by the theorems of McCarthy [16], the first author [4], and Geisser and Hesselholt [7] in addition to an elementary observation about homotopy cartesian diagrams of ring spectra.…”
Section: K(a) −→ T C(a)mentioning
confidence: 92%