2012
DOI: 10.1044/1058-0360(2011/10-0063)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationships Between Vocabulary Size, Working Memory, and Phonological Awareness in Spanish-Speaking English Language Learners

Abstract: Purpose The goals of this study were to evaluate the impact of short-term phonological awareness (PA) instruction presented in children’s first language (L1; Spanish) on gains in their L1 and second language (L2; English) and to determine whether relationships exist between vocabulary size, verbal working memory, and PA in Spanish-speaking English language learners (ELLs). Method Participants included 25 kindergartners who received PA instruction and 10… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
(110 reference statements)
1
24
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Working memory has been referred to as a processing resource of limited capacity involved in the preservation of information while simultaneously processing the same or other information (e.g., Baddeley, 2012;Engle, Tuholski, Laughlin, & Conway, 1999). Several studies suggest that the development of WM involves the increasing ability to retain information (e.g., Alloway, Gathercole, Kirkwood, & Elliot, 2009;Gathercole, Pickering, Ambridge, & Wearing, 2004;Swanson, 2011) and that such development may be related to English language learners' performance on measures of reading and language acquisition (e.g., Gorman, 2012;Swanson, Sáez, & Gerber, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Working memory has been referred to as a processing resource of limited capacity involved in the preservation of information while simultaneously processing the same or other information (e.g., Baddeley, 2012;Engle, Tuholski, Laughlin, & Conway, 1999). Several studies suggest that the development of WM involves the increasing ability to retain information (e.g., Alloway, Gathercole, Kirkwood, & Elliot, 2009;Gathercole, Pickering, Ambridge, & Wearing, 2004;Swanson, 2011) and that such development may be related to English language learners' performance on measures of reading and language acquisition (e.g., Gorman, 2012;Swanson, Sáez, & Gerber, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that some previous research has found that nonword repetition performance is correlated with language familiarity, and that greater vocabulary knowledge is often associated with higher levels of nonword recall (Gorman, 2012;Lee and Gorman, 2012;Masoura and Gathercole, 1999), it is interesting to note that both NRT and KNRT accuracy was unrelated to the language test scores. It is possible that this result is an advantage of bilingualism.…”
Section: Language Ability and Language-based Processing Measuresmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A deficit in either phonological skills or naming speed is thought to result in a less severe form of reading disability than a combined deficit. While tasks such as rhyming, alliteration, categorization, phoneme blending, segmentation, elision, and nonword repetition (NWR) measure phonological skill [33,[36][37][38][39], rapid automatic naming (RAN) is the primary measure of naming speed. There exists some controversy regarding the theoretical explanations for the relationship between naming speed and reading [40], with differing key constructs thought to underly the relationship including phonological awareness [41], orthographic processing [42], and general cognitive processing or executive function [43].…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%