1990
DOI: 10.1017/s1742758400012704
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationships between tsetse challenge and trypanosome prevalence in trypanotolerant and susceptible cattle

Abstract: The relationships between estimates of tsetse challenge and trypanosome prevalence in trypanotolerant and susceptible cattle were examined at sites of the African Trypanotolerant Livestock Network. Estimates of tsetse challenge were determined as the product of tsetse relative densities, their trypanosome infectionrates and the proportions of feeds taken by them from cattle. Trypanosome prevalence in both trypanotolerant and susceptible breeds of cattle was estimated from monthly examination of groups of ear-t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…land cover, consistent link to a particular vector species). However, looking at the literature some common factors are associated with prevalence variability: annual and seasonal differences in sampling time, cattle abundance at watering places, micro-environmental ecological conditions [ 40 – 42 ], variations in tsetse and other hematophagous fly (mainly Stomoxis spp. and tabanids) densities and their respective vectorial capacity and seasonality [ 43 45 ] and the trypanotolerance/susceptibility of local cattle breeds [ 25 , 40 , 46 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…land cover, consistent link to a particular vector species). However, looking at the literature some common factors are associated with prevalence variability: annual and seasonal differences in sampling time, cattle abundance at watering places, micro-environmental ecological conditions [ 40 – 42 ], variations in tsetse and other hematophagous fly (mainly Stomoxis spp. and tabanids) densities and their respective vectorial capacity and seasonality [ 43 45 ] and the trypanotolerance/susceptibility of local cattle breeds [ 25 , 40 , 46 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in our study, the tsetse abundance was not adjusted for the tsetse infection rate rendering the estimation of the real tsetse challenge impossible and consequently, the link between the tsetse challenge and AAT prevalence [ 68 ]. Further experimental data is thus needed to know if a reduction in tsetse challenge would lead to a significant reduction in trypanosomosis prevalence [ 40 ]. Furthermore, the link between AT and trypanosomosis prevalence is weakened by the fact that cattle bred in PAs located far from rivers and/or suitable tsetse habitats, travel longer distances to reach watering points and grasslands in the dry season: cattle is being brought to the vectors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, infection rates in cattle of 5-10% are normal, and are maintained at this level only through regular block treatment of animals with trypanocides. The inability of control strategies to severely curtail trypanosomiasis under conditions of very low tsetse fly challenge is unusual, contrasting sharply with the expected relationship between tsetse fly challenge and cattle infection in other areas (Leak et al, 1990).…”
Section: Trypanosomiasis In Cattlementioning
confidence: 94%
“…The biology and ecology of trypanosomes and tsetse support these results, for they define a highly non-linear relationship between tsetse challenge and trypanosomosis prevalence in cattle (35). Large decreases in disease prevalence can be achieved only with near eradication of tsetse populations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Most countries in Africa lack the institutional environment necessary for any large-scale, widely dispersed, sustained and intense development efforts (35,45). In most cases, trypanosomosis and the tsetse fly will be fundamentally uncontrollable -where controlling refers to having power over or being in command of a phenomenon.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%