1997
DOI: 10.3354/meps149173
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationships between taxonomic resolution and data transformations in analyses of a macrobenthic community along an established pollution gradient

Abstract: Although surveys of soft-bottom macrofauna are an important tool in marine pollution monitoring, the high costs involved have often been criticised. Species identification is time-consuming, and one solution is to identify organisms to a taxonomic level higher than species. This study, using data from a survey in the vicinity of the Valhall oil field in the Norwegian sector of the North Sea, examines the effects of using abundances of different taxonomic levels, and of using different data transformations (use… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

8
142
2
4

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 170 publications
(156 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(30 reference statements)
8
142
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…changes at the level of orders or phyla. Olsgard et al (1997) simultaneously examined effects of altering taxonomic resolution and transforming the data on results of ANOSIM tests on soft-sediment macrofauna along a gradient of pollution. They, too, found that transformation had stronger effects on the measured patterns than dld changing resolution, with decreased ability to identify pattern for analyses of strongly transformed data at the coarsest taxonomic resolution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…changes at the level of orders or phyla. Olsgard et al (1997) simultaneously examined effects of altering taxonomic resolution and transforming the data on results of ANOSIM tests on soft-sediment macrofauna along a gradient of pollution. They, too, found that transformation had stronger effects on the measured patterns than dld changing resolution, with decreased ability to identify pattern for analyses of strongly transformed data at the coarsest taxonomic resolution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a study of the literature, there appears to be an automatic tendency to transform data to X o Z 5 before proceeding with ANOSIM or nMDS plots. Both the transformations and levels of taxonomic resolution used can strongly influence the significance of any results obtained (Olsgard et al 1997) and should be carefully considered in the light of the hypotheses being tested before each is selected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of different sieve mesh sizes (Thompson et al, 2003) and the application of subsampling techniques (Carey and Keough, 2002) have been proposed for the establishment of more cost-effective methods. Additionally multivariate techniques (Olsgard et al, 1997) and recently developed sample-size/sample-effort free biodiversity indices have also been used as an alternative to species-level identification of the total fauna (e.g. Warwick and Clarke, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As has recently been shown in some coastal systems (Worm et al 2002), the effects of consumers and nutrients on diversity consistently depend on each other, and the direction of their effects and peak diversity shift between sites of low and high productivity. Also, as this is a case of communities linked with predator-prey interactions, it is possible that the effects of disturbing the higher trophic levels (fish) are likely to cascade down the lower trophic levels as shown by Worm & Myers (2003) for open sea ecosystems.In cases such as monitoring of pollution and other types of anthropogenic stress, macrofauna and the associated surrogates can be very useful as has been shown in many studies for different types of effects (Warwick 1988, Olsgard et al 1997, Dauvin et al 2003. In this particular context, monitoring is designed to detect, for instance, the spatial extent of disturbance using community structure and diversity as a sensitive tool.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%