2018
DOI: 10.5194/esurf-2018-79
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationships between regional coastal land cover distributions and elevation reveal data uncertainty in a sea-level rise impacts model

Abstract: Abstract. Understanding land loss or resilience in response to sea-level rise (SLR) requires spatially extensive and continuous datasets to capture landscape variability. We investigate sensitivity and skill of a model that predicts dynamic response likelihood to SLR across the northeastern U.S. by exploring several data inputs and outcomes. Using elevation and land cover datasets, we determine where data error is likely, quantify its effect on predictions, and evaluate its influence on prediction confidence. … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We forced connections from the substrate type, vegetation density, and distance to MOSH nodes to the resource type node and from the geomorphic setting to the distance to MOSH node because prior studies have found prominent relationships among similar variables (Patterson 1988, MacIvor 1990, Patterson et al 1991, Jones 1997, Cohen et al 2008, Maslo et al 2011). We also forced connections among elevation, distance to ocean, and geomorphic setting because of known inherent correlations among these variables in coastal systems (Young et al 2011, Halls et al 2018, Enwright et al 2019, Lentz et al 2019).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We forced connections from the substrate type, vegetation density, and distance to MOSH nodes to the resource type node and from the geomorphic setting to the distance to MOSH node because prior studies have found prominent relationships among similar variables (Patterson 1988, MacIvor 1990, Patterson et al 1991, Jones 1997, Cohen et al 2008, Maslo et al 2011). We also forced connections among elevation, distance to ocean, and geomorphic setting because of known inherent correlations among these variables in coastal systems (Young et al 2011, Halls et al 2018, Enwright et al 2019, Lentz et al 2019).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here it is important to note the inherent relationship between coastal land cover and elevation variables, wherein elevation acts as an important control on land cover distributions (Zinnert et al 2017;Lentz et al 2019). For example, sites that supported a higher percentage of forests also had a higher percentage area that was unlikely to be inundated (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, sites that supported a higher percentage of forests also had a higher percentage area that was unlikely to be inundated (Fig. 5); however, sites with forests also tend to contain higher elevation zones that make those sites less vulnerable to SLR (Zinnert et al 2016b;Lentz et al 2019). The correlated relationship between land cover, elevation zone, and SLR vulnerability makes it difficult to separate whether it's the higher elevations or ecosystem feedbacks that make a site better able to respond dynamically to SLR-although it is likely that both affect inundation vulnerability through time (Corenblit et al 2011;Brantley et al 2014;Zinnert et al 2017 and references therein).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations