2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11145-016-9708-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationships between reading comprehension and its components in young Chinese-as-a-second-language learners

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Like most CSL learners, Hong Kong’s ethnic minority students who participated in this study recognized the componential radicals when reading characters (Shen & Ke, 2007; Williams, 2013; Wong, 2017b), and their orthographic skills played a crucial role in their Chinese word reading (Zhou & McBride, 2015; Zhou et al, 2018). Previous studies indicate that the orthographic skills of young CSL learners aid their further literacy development in reading comprehension (Leong et al, 2011; Shum et al, 2014; Wong, 2017a) and writing (Leong et al, 2018; Wong, 2018a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like most CSL learners, Hong Kong’s ethnic minority students who participated in this study recognized the componential radicals when reading characters (Shen & Ke, 2007; Williams, 2013; Wong, 2017b), and their orthographic skills played a crucial role in their Chinese word reading (Zhou & McBride, 2015; Zhou et al, 2018). Previous studies indicate that the orthographic skills of young CSL learners aid their further literacy development in reading comprehension (Leong et al, 2011; Shum et al, 2014; Wong, 2017a) and writing (Leong et al, 2018; Wong, 2018a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, reading comprehension depends on successful word reading, and word decoding is an important part of word reading (Perfetti, 2007). However, the impact of word decoding skills was found to be modulated by the transparency of the orthography, being stronger and tending to remain for a longer period in languages with opaque orthography (Florit and Cain, 2011;Joshi et al, 2015;Wong, 2016). That is, the ability to retrieve phonological information from Chinese characters that have been historically viewed as meaning-based rather than speech-based develops at a slower pace than in alphabetic languages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the simple view of reading (SVR, Hoover and Gough, 1990 ), reading comprehension is the product of word decoding and listening comprehension, which emphasizes the role of speech decoding of written words and oral comprehension in word recognition and higher-level cognitive processing. The model has been extensively verified in research on languages differing in orthographic depth, and both L1 and L2 readers ( Florit and Cain, 2011 ; Janssen et al, 2017 ), including CSL learners ( Wong, 2016 ). Beyond SVR, recent research has highlighted the importance of the quality of word representations for reading skill, including comprehension (lexical quality hypothesis, LQH, Perfetti and Hart, 2001 ; Droop and Verhoeven, 2003 ; Perfetti, 2007 ; Perfetti and Stafura, 2014 ; Verhoeven et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Orthographic knowledge is commonly considered to benefit word recognition and subsequent reading comprehension across languages (e.g., Burt, 2006 ; Leong et al, 2011 , 2019 ; Wong, 2017 ; Deacon et al, 2019 ; Zarić et al, 2020 ). In alphabetic languages such as English, there are generally two separate but correlated types of orthographic knowledge, one is called “general/sub-lexical orthographic knowledge” (e.g., identifying the letter patterns that violate the orthographic regularities, such as “bbaf”), and the other is called “lexical orthographic knowledge” (e.g., choosing the correct word form between “rain” and “rane”) ( Apel, 2011 ; Conrad et al, 2013 ; Rothe et al, 2015 ).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking the character “花 [faa1, flower]” as an example, a learner with rich sub-lexical orthographic knowledge not only notices that the radical “艹” [plant] only appears at the top of a character, but also understand that a character with “艹” may be plant-related in meaning. For CSL learners, it has been well documented that they rely more on sub-lexical orthographic knowledge to recognize characters than their Chinese native counterparts do ( Shen and Ke, 2007 ; Chang et al, 2014 ; Wong, 2017 ; Loh et al, 2018 ; Chan et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%