Relationships Between Poverty and Psychopathology

Abstract

Context Social causation (adversity and stress) vs social selection (downward mobility from familial liability to mental illness) are competing theories about the origins of mental illness. Objective To test the role of social selection vs social causation of childhood psychopathology using a natural experiment. Design Quasi-experimental, longitudinal study. Population and Setting A representative population sample of 1420 rural children aged 9 to 13 years at intake were given annual psychiatric assessments for 8 years (1993-2000). One quarter of the sample were American Indian, and the remaining were predominantly white. Halfway through the study, a casino opening on the Indian reservation gave every American Indian an income supplement that increased annually. This increase moved 14% of study families out of poverty, while 53% remained poor, and 32% were never poor. Incomes of non-Indian families were unaffected. Main Outcome Measures Levels of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, psychiatric symptoms in the never-poor, persistently poor, and ex-poor children were compared for the 4 years before and after the casino opened. Results Before the casino opened, the persistently poor and ex-poor children had more psychiatric symptoms (4.38 and 4.28, respectively) than the never-poor children (2.75), but after the opening levels among the ex-poor fell to those of the neverpoor children, while levels among those who were persistently poor remained high (odds ratio, 1.50; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-2.09; and odds ratio, 0.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.77-1.07, respectively). The effect was specific to symptoms of conduct and oppositional defiant disorders. Anxiety and depression symptoms were unaffected. Similar results were found in non-Indian children whose families moved out of poverty during the same period. Conclusions An income intervention that moved families out of poverty for reasons that cannot be ascribed to family characteristics had a major effect on some types of children's psychiatric disorders, but not on others. Results support a social causation explanation for conduct and oppositional disorder, but not for anxiety or depression.

Individual and Societal Effects of Mental Disorders on Earnings in the United States: Results From the National Comorbidity Survey Replication

“…There is good reason to believe that such an effect exists (35). Because of this limitation, while we can state that SMI is associated with low earnings we cannot say how much of this association is due to SMI causing low earnings.…”

Socioeconomic background modulates cognition–achievement relationships in reading

“…In support of the first possibility, however, Telzrow (1987) found that higher socioeconomic background may attenuate the long-term academic difficulties of children with learning disabilities, with or without intervention. In addition, changing a child's circumstances may result in improvement across diverse domains, ranging from cognitive performance to mental health (Costello, Compton, Keeler, & Angold, 2003;Leventhal & Brooks-Gunn, 2003a). …”

How early triadic family processes predict children's strengths and difficulties at age three

“…Additionally, no other family risk factor could explain further variance if entered together in the regression analyses. For evaluating the impact of fathers' education level, the findings of a natural experiment by Costello, Compton, Keeler, and Angold (2003) are interesting. They found that with unexpected supplemental income that moved families out of poverty (and for reasons that cannot be ascribed to family characteristics), children's conduct and oppositional defiant disorders decreased.…”