Relationships between indices of sedentary behavior and hedonic well-being: A scoping review

Sui, Anna; Prapavessis, Harry

doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2021.101920

Cited by 9 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 75 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The health consequences of prolonged sedentary behavior include an increased risk for cardiometabolic diseases [3,4] and all-cause mortality [5]. Furthermore, sedentary behavior has been suggested to negatively affect mood and well-being [6]. With the latest update in 2020, the World Health Organization emphasizes that, aside from being physically active, adults should reduce or replace time spent sedentarily as much as possible [7].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Acute Effects of Single or Repeated Bouts of Vigorous-Intensity Exercise on Insulin and Glucose Metabolism during Postprandial Sedentary Behavior

Engeroff

Füzéki

Vogt

et al. 2022

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Fitness and exercise may counteract the detrimental metabolic and mood adaptations during prolonged sitting. This study distinguishes the immediate effects of a single bout vs. work-load and intensity-matched repeated exercise breaks on subjective well-being, blood glucose, and insulin response (analyzed as area under the curve) during sedentary time; and assesses the influence of fitness and caloric intake on metabolic alterations during sedentariness. Eighteen women underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing and three 4 h sitting interventions: two exercise interventions (70% VO2max, 30 min, cycle ergometer: (1) cycling prior to sitting; (2) sitting interrupted by 5 × 6 min cycling), and one control condition (sitting). Participants consumed one meal with ad libitum quantity (caloric intake), but standardized macronutrient proportion. Exercise breaks (4057 ± 2079 μU/mL·min) reduced insulin values compared to a single bout of exercise (5346 ± 5000 μU/mL·min) and the control condition (6037 ± 3571 μU/mL·min) (p ≤ 0.05). ANCOVA revealed moderating effects of caloric intake (519 ± 211 kilocalories) (p ≤ 0.01), but no effects of cardiorespiratory fitness (41.3 ± 4.2 mL/kg/min). Breaks also led to lower depression, but higher arousal compared to a no exercise control (p ≤ 0.05). Both exercise trials led to decreased agitation (p ≤ 0.05). Exercise prior to sitting led to greater peace of mind during sedentary behavior (p ≤ 0.05). Just being fit or exercising prior to sedentary behavior are not feasible to cope with acute detrimental metabolic changes during sedentary behavior. Exercise breaks reduce the insulin response to a meal. Despite their vigorous intensity, breaks are perceived as positive stimulus. Detrimental metabolic changes during sedentary time could also be minimized by limiting caloric intake.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Acute Effects of Single or Repeated Bouts of Vigorous-Intensity Exercise on Insulin and Glucose Metabolism during Postprandial Sedentary Behavior

Engeroff

Füzéki

Vogt

et al. 2022

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Being inactive can negatively impact one's physical health and negatively impact one's perception of one's own vitality and health. However, a study found that more time spent sedentary or physically inactive is associated with lower well-being, and sedentary behaviors show weak relationships with subjective well-being [32]. This study shows a negative correlation between SB and with particular perceptions of one's physical self [36].…”

Section: Table 2 Respondents' Sedentary Behaviormentioning

confidence: 59%

Level of Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior towards Physical Well-Being of Secondary Teachers

Layag,

Ofrin

2024

int.jour.sci.res.mana

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In contemporary society, characterized by technological advancements and sedentary lifestyles, the significance of physical activity for overall well-being cannot be overstated. Despite global initiatives to promote physical activity and mitigate sedentary behavior, educators, particularly secondary teachers, face unique challenges due to their demanding profession and prolonged periods of sedentary work. The World Health Organization underscores the importance of regular physical activity for maintaining health and well-being, yet many teachers struggle to meet recommended activity levels. The study used a descriptive-correlational research design participated by 60 secondary teachers from Buenavista National High School who are currently teaching during the 2023–2024 school year. Based on the tallied responses, teachers varied widely in age, ranging from 25 to 64 years old, with fewer respondents in their late 50s and 60s. The most common age group was 25 to 34 years old, making up 48.33% of the total sample, and most of them were single. There are more female teachers than male teachers, with females comprising a larger proportion (58.33%) of the total compared to males (41.67%). As revealed, teachers have a moderate level of physical activity and have sedentary behavior. So, even if a person engages in enough physical activity to meet the guidelines, they may still be considered sedentary if they spend a significant portion of their day sitting or lying down at work, at home, for study, travel, or in their leisure time. In teachers' perceptions to physical well-being, they believed that they didn’t have a normal weight, waist, enough sleep, and good posture. They believe that low physical activity and sedentary behavior have a negative impact on their physical well-being, while at the same time, physical activity and avoiding sedentary behavior are essential for physical well-being. Further, it is depicted that there is no significant correlation between the profile of the respondents and physical well-being and no significant correlation between physical activity and sedentary behavior to physical well-being as well.

show abstract

“…Nevertheless, there is now review level evidence highlighting the potential of physical activity to enhance MWB, focusing on both the hedonic and eudaimonic dimensions (16-18). The ndings for sedentary behaviour are more mixed (e.g., 19,20), but there has been relatively limited consideration of this relationship.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Domains matter: Cross-sectional associations between mental well-being and domain specific physical activity and sedentary behaviour in n=31,818 adults in Scotland

Niven

Strain

2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Mental well-being is an important protective factor for health, and interest in the relationship between mental well-being and physical activity and sedentary behaviour is growing. Previous research indicates that domain and type of activity matter to fully understand the relationship, and that the association may differ across levels of mental well-being. This study aimed to investigate the domain-specific associations for physical activity and sedentary behaviours with different levels of mental wellbeing using population-level data.Methods We pooled data from the nationally representative 2012–2019 Scottish Health Survey. Respondents aged ≥ 16 years reported domain-specific physical activity over the previous four weeks and average domain-specific daily sitting time for week and weekend days. Mental wellbeing was assessed using the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale. Associations were investigated using cubic spline and multinomial regressions, progressively adjusted for demographic variables, body mass index, self-reported general health, and other movement behaviours.Results The sample comprised of 31,818 adults (52.3% female). The majority (71.2%) had a medium MWB score with 15.2% and 13.5% in the low and high categories respectively. The findings indicated that home-based heavy manual (including gardening and DIY), walking, sport and exercise, and leisure time sitting were all positively associated with mental well-being. There was no association evident for heavy housework or occupational sitting, and high levels of TV/screen time sitting were negatively associated with mental well-being. Activity at work presented a mixed picture. For walking and sport and exercise, the relationship differed by mental well-being level with any increase in activity reducing the likelihood of low mental well-being but only the highest levels of activity increasing the likelihood of high mental well-being.Conclusions The findings of this large population level study extend the argument that domains and types of activity matter, and not all physical activity and sedentary behaviour is equal in terms of mental well-being. Additionally, the relationship between some activity and mental well-being can vary depending on levels of mental-well-being. In order to enhance mental well-being, physical activity and sedentary behaviour messaging and promotion should be nuanced to highlight the most promising activities and target those who may most benefit.

show abstract

Relationships between indices of sedentary behavior and hedonic well-being: A scoping review

Cited by 9 publications

References 75 publications

The Acute Effects of Single or Repeated Bouts of Vigorous-Intensity Exercise on Insulin and Glucose Metabolism during Postprandial Sedentary Behavior

The Acute Effects of Single or Repeated Bouts of Vigorous-Intensity Exercise on Insulin and Glucose Metabolism during Postprandial Sedentary Behavior

Level of Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior towards Physical Well-Being of Secondary Teachers

Domains matter: Cross-sectional associations between mental well-being and domain specific physical activity and sedentary behaviour in n=31,818 adults in Scotland

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About