1988
DOI: 10.1016/0006-3223(88)90052-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationships between glutamate and monoamine metabolites in cerebrospinal fluid and serum in healthy volunteers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
42
1
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
4
42
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with several studies reporting diminished glutamate function in schizophrenics, including a decrease in CSF levels of glutamate (Kim et al, 1980; but see Perry, 1982), an increase in glutamate binding in the striatum (Kornhuber et al, 1989), increased kainate binding in the frontal cortex (presumably to presynaptic autoreceptors on glutamatergic terminals; Nishikawa et al, 1983a;Deakin et al, 1989), and a diminished efflux of glutamate from synaptosomes derived from schizophrenic brains (Sherman et al, 1991). A decrease in glutamate release in the ventral striatum should, in turn, decrease glutamate-stimulated tonic DA release, which is consistent with the reported negative correlation between glutamate levels and HV A concentration in the CSF of schizophrenics (Alfredsson et al, 1988).…”
Section: Systems Involved In the Induction Of Depolarization Blocksupporting
confidence: 76%
“…This is consistent with several studies reporting diminished glutamate function in schizophrenics, including a decrease in CSF levels of glutamate (Kim et al, 1980; but see Perry, 1982), an increase in glutamate binding in the striatum (Kornhuber et al, 1989), increased kainate binding in the frontal cortex (presumably to presynaptic autoreceptors on glutamatergic terminals; Nishikawa et al, 1983a;Deakin et al, 1989), and a diminished efflux of glutamate from synaptosomes derived from schizophrenic brains (Sherman et al, 1991). A decrease in glutamate release in the ventral striatum should, in turn, decrease glutamate-stimulated tonic DA release, which is consistent with the reported negative correlation between glutamate levels and HV A concentration in the CSF of schizophrenics (Alfredsson et al, 1988).…”
Section: Systems Involved In the Induction Of Depolarization Blocksupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Therefore, controversies prevail whether to consider autism as a hyperglutamatergic or a hypoglutamatergic disorder. Although glutamate is considered not to readily cross the blood-brain barrier, the level of glutamate in the blood is correlated positively with the cerebrospinal fluid level of glutamate in humans [11]. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the plasma circulating levels of glutamate in Chinese children with ASD by comparing them with age-matched and sex-matched healthy and intellectual disability (ID) controls.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In substance addiction, drugs of abuse alter glutamate transmission29); nicotine enhances extracellular levels of glutamate,30) opiate reduces synaptic overflow of glutamate,31) and alcohol has mixed effect on extracellular levels of glutamate 11). In addition to these direct effects, glutamate regulates dopaminergic activity and thus modulates dopaminergic reward processing via incentive arousal for drug-related cue 23,32). Conditioned drug-related cue elicits a phasic increase in the firing of ventral tegmental area dopamine neuron and eventually lead to the co-release of dopamine and glutamate in prefrontal cortex and the nucleus accumbens 22).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since serum levels of glutamate are positively correlated with the cerebrospinal fluid levels of glutamate in humans,23) altered glutamate neurotransmission in the brain can be inferred from the changes in the serum levels of glutamate. Thus the present pilot study assessed the serum levels of glutamate and dopamine in male adults with IGD without psychiatric comorbidities in comparison with healthy controls.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%