1982
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1982.tb04981.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationships Between Food Preferences and Food Acceptance Ratings

Abstract: A study was conducted to assess relationships between food preference ratings and food acceptability ratings. Acceptability ratings for each of two discriminably different samples of nine food items were obtained using the 9‐point hedonic scale. Regression analysis indicated that no linear relationship existed between these ratings and either hedonic or frequency preference ratings of the foods. In addition, the range of acceptability ratings was smaller than the range of corresponding’preference ratings. Pane… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
30
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(6 reference statements)
7
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The correlation among affective ratings and use of sweet foods is in line with earlier studies (6,7,26). The scores for craving for sweet foods were correlated with liking and usefrequency of sweet foods, which further validates the use of this scale.…”
Section: Correlations Among the Questionnaire Variablessupporting
confidence: 72%
“…The correlation among affective ratings and use of sweet foods is in line with earlier studies (6,7,26). The scores for craving for sweet foods were correlated with liking and usefrequency of sweet foods, which further validates the use of this scale.…”
Section: Correlations Among the Questionnaire Variablessupporting
confidence: 72%
“…The corresponding curvilinear functions varied from 15.4% (PLEA vs. frUSE, Carelian pie) to 59.4% (LIKE vs. liBUY, reduced-fat cheese). Although the lower limit was low, the predictions were, on average, within the limits earlier presented in the literature (Cardello and Maller, 1982). The mean prediction was highest when likelihood of buying was predicted by liking, while the predictive equation was poorest when frequency of use was predicted either by pleasantness or liking.…”
Section: Prediction Of Usesupporting
confidence: 53%
“…A common estimate of the relationship between affective responses and variables reflecting consumption is that affection predicts 25-50% of consumption (see Cardello and Maller, 1982). Such prediction stems from correlation coefficients within the range 0.5-0.7 between the two measures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Food preference has been defined by Cardello and Maller (1982) as "expressed degree of liking or disliking for a food when obtained in response to a food name." Since taste is the primary determinant of food selection (Krondl & Coleman, 1988), food preference, as defined above, is likely to be highly dependent on memories of hedonic evaluations of taste.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%