Relationships between fluctuations of environmental regulation, technological innovation, and economic growth: a multinational perspective

Abstract

PurposeEnvironmental regulation is in a continuous state of intense change and modification amid the long-term tensions between environmental protection and economic growth. In this article, the authors creatively investigate how fluctuations of environmental regulation influence a nation's economic growth while also examining the mediating effect of technological innovation.Design/methodology/approachUsing sample data of 36 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries from 2013 to 2018, environmental regulation is differentiated in two aspects of formal environmental regulation (FER) and informal environmental regulation (IER) and analyzed to assess the effects of regulatory fluctuations on investment and technological innovation.FindingsThe research results demonstrate that both FER fluctuation and IER fluctuation exert a significant negative impact on economic growth. These two fluctuations in environmental regulation increase uncertainty and unpredictable risks for corporations and investors, significantly stifling the willingness to contribute to innovation activities and leading to a diminished level of innovation. Technological innovation is revealed to have a mediating influence on the relationship of environmental regulation fluctuation to economic growth.Originality/valueThese findings enrich the research on the impact of environmental regulation from a dynamic, multinational perspective, contributing to the literature by exploring the relationships between environmental regulation fluctuation, technological innovation and economic growth at the OECD-country level.

Innovational duality and sustainable development: finding optima amidst socio-ecological policy trade-off in post-COVID-19 era

“…Ideally, innovation has been perceived as a tool for bringing environmental benefits. The studies by Anthony et al (2018) and Xie et al (2021) indicate the environmental benefits of innovation. However, the recent work by Chen et al (2021) indicates the negative social externalities exerted by innovation.…”

“…The studies by Anthony et al. (2018) and Xie et al. (2021) indicate the environmental benefits of innovation.…”

Decarbonization, Environmental Regulation, and Economic Boom: An Indicator Assessment Based on the Industrial Waste

“…Shen et al (2019) studied the nonlinear dynamic effects of various categories of ER on environmental total factor productivity (ETFP) in the industrial sector using a threshold model and found that a high strength of environmental regulations undermines technological innovation in these firms. Xie et al (2021) explored the impact of ER fluctuations on a country's economic growth, and the research results showed that both formal ER fluctuations and informal ER fluctuations had significant negative impacts on economic growth.…”

Guest editorial: Editorial for special issue on the role of big data on the transition to circular economy and sustainable operations management

“…Times series and regression methods are other topics that we published some high-quality papers (Miao, 2021; Xie et al , 2021; Yang et al , 2021a; Yaoteng and Xin, 2021; Duan et al , 2022). For example, Zhao and Chen (2021) examined the role of an effective government and an effective market in preventing and controlling the withdrawal of innovators.…”