1985
DOI: 10.1016/0004-6981(85)90264-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationships between fine particulate species, gaseous pollutants and meteorological parameters in detroit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
1

Year Published

1985
1985
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the correlation coefficient between S0 4 f = and HUP, which has been used as an indicator of heterogeneous S04f = formation, 22 is only 0.24. The role of photochemistry is an expected result, and it is consistent with results from other locations in the eastern U.S. 36 and indicates that a significant portion of the S0 4 f = variability depends upon the residence time of the air masses over the coal combustion areas of the Midwest. The much lower correlation between S04f = and NE(t), the residence time over the NE, where fuel oil combustion dominates over coal combustion, is consistent with the low Vf -S04f = correlation and the high Sef -S04f = correlation coefficient.…”
Section: Sources Of Hazesupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Furthermore, the correlation coefficient between S0 4 f = and HUP, which has been used as an indicator of heterogeneous S04f = formation, 22 is only 0.24. The role of photochemistry is an expected result, and it is consistent with results from other locations in the eastern U.S. 36 and indicates that a significant portion of the S0 4 f = variability depends upon the residence time of the air masses over the coal combustion areas of the Midwest. The much lower correlation between S04f = and NE(t), the residence time over the NE, where fuel oil combustion dominates over coal combustion, is consistent with the low Vf -S04f = correlation and the high Sef -S04f = correlation coefficient.…”
Section: Sources Of Hazesupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Principal component analysis (PCA) (Hopke, 1985) uses measurements of pollutant concentrations at a sampling site to identify significantly correlated variables. This method extracts components that explain the majority of the variance in the data matrix, which are then qualitatively interpreted as possible sources (Hopke et al, 1976;Hopke, 1985;Wolff et al, 1985). PCA is often useful for providing information regarding source characteristics in terms of the elements that are associated with a given source type.…”
Section: Principal Component Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 PCA extracts the principal components, explaining the majority of variance of the data matrix that are then qualitatively interpreted as possible sources. Although PCA has been applied as a tool for source identification in some air quality studies, 3,4 it suffers from several drawbacks in general. The factors of PCA are rarely physically explainable without further transformation (rotation), and no fully satisfactory rotation techniques have yet been found.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%