2017
DOI: 10.1071/fp17077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationships between climate of origin and photosynthetic responses to an episodic heatwave depend on growth CO2 concentration for Eucalyptus camaldulensis var. camaldulensis

Abstract: Stressful episodic weather is likely to affect the C balance of trees as the climate changes, potentially altering survival. However, the role of elevated CO2 concentration ([CO2]) in tolerating off-season episodic extremes is not clear. We tested for interactive effects of elevated CO2 and springtime heat stress on photosynthesis for seven genotypes of Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehnh. var. camaldulensis, representing its widespread distribution across south-eastern Australia. We grew clonal material under glas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The extreme temperatures during heatwaves contribute to dry atmospheric conditions with high vapour pressure deficits (Teskey et al ., 2015), and are well known to directly affect plant physiology. Short‐term heatwaves have been shown to change the expression profile of heat shock proteins (Aspinwall et al ., 2019), reduce photosynthetic rates (Duarte et al ., 2016; Loik et al ., 2017), impact photosystem II (PSII; Guha et al ., 2018; Pšidová et al ., 2018), and change carbon allocation (Werner et al ., 2020). This can culminate in major ecosystem effects such as forest dieback events, loss of primary production, and alteration of important ecosystem functions (Ciais et al ., 2005; Reichstein et al ., 2013; Allen et al ., 2015; Teskey et al ., 2015; van Gorsel et al ., 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extreme temperatures during heatwaves contribute to dry atmospheric conditions with high vapour pressure deficits (Teskey et al ., 2015), and are well known to directly affect plant physiology. Short‐term heatwaves have been shown to change the expression profile of heat shock proteins (Aspinwall et al ., 2019), reduce photosynthetic rates (Duarte et al ., 2016; Loik et al ., 2017), impact photosystem II (PSII; Guha et al ., 2018; Pšidová et al ., 2018), and change carbon allocation (Werner et al ., 2020). This can culminate in major ecosystem effects such as forest dieback events, loss of primary production, and alteration of important ecosystem functions (Ciais et al ., 2005; Reichstein et al ., 2013; Allen et al ., 2015; Teskey et al ., 2015; van Gorsel et al ., 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genetic variability in the response to heat waves could be related to the climate of origin [20]. We did not perform detailed analyses based on climate of origin because we only had one genotype from each location.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, daytime measurements were collected with half of the plants experiencing a heat wave (and the other half not experiencing a heat wave), but nighttime measurements were performed immediately after the heat wave under ambient pre-heat-wave conditions and, consequently, all plants experienced the same environment. Further details on glasshouse design and set-up are given by [17,20].…”
Section: Plants and Growing Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If CUE is improved under eCO 2 , carbon allocation patterns may change such that increased rates of C assimilation stimulate growth of roots rather than stems (Finzi et al, 2007;De Kauwe et al, 2014;Zaehle et al, 2014), which would be undesirable for the timber growing industry, yet potentially improve resilience during dry conditions (Grote et al, 2016). However, identifying provenances that show net-positive stem growth under eCO 2 is critical to meeting a rising global demand for wood and wood products (Wang et al, 2010;Booth et al, 2015;Loik et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%