2018
DOI: 10.5604/12321966.1233562
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationships between bone mineral density and new indices of body composition in young, sedentary men and women

Abstract: Introduction. Data concerning the relationship between body fat and BMD are equivocal since both positive and negative effects have been noted. Recently, the index of fat mass (IFM) representing subjects with different body fat and similar lean mass and index of lean mass (ILM) representing subjects with different lean body mass and similar body fat, have been used to evaluate body composition effect on BMD in middle-aged women. This study aimed at determination of ILM and IFM association with BMD in young men… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

3
0
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the higher body fat percentage among females is attributed to women having a biologically higher percentage of body fat than men. These findings are in line with a study by Kęska et al [ 46 ] conducted among university students who reported a higher mean of fat percentage among females (26.0%) compared with males (15.8%) [ 46 ]. Research in a Croatian university found that females had a higher mean fat percentage (31.8%) than males (22.3%) [ 26 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…However, the higher body fat percentage among females is attributed to women having a biologically higher percentage of body fat than men. These findings are in line with a study by Kęska et al [ 46 ] conducted among university students who reported a higher mean of fat percentage among females (26.0%) compared with males (15.8%) [ 46 ]. Research in a Croatian university found that females had a higher mean fat percentage (31.8%) than males (22.3%) [ 26 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In contrast, weight, BMI, FM, and BFLBM showed moderate positive significant correlations with spine and hip aBMD, and 4% tibia variables for women. e strong relationship with FM and bone health is similar to the study of Keska et al who reported that FM was significant for BMD in young Polish women [23]. Also, Reddy et al reported that BFLBM was an important determinant of BMD in men, but both BFLBM and FM were important in women aged 20-35 years [24].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…In this study, we found that FM, VATM, and BMD correlated significantly in female AGHD patients, but not in male patients. e association between FM and BMD has been confirmed in several studies [28][29][30]. Moreover, the marked sex differences in the impact of FM on BMD have also been reported previously.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%