2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.09.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationships between avian richness and landscape structure at multiple scales using multiple landscapes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
60
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
6
60
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In this sense, the weak association between species richness and the percentage of monospecific stands is supporting the reported favourable effect of tree diversity at scales smaller than 1 × 1 km. Regarding the type of forest, that is, coniferous or broadleaved species, this seems not to be so determinant for species richness as forest cover or other structural features (see also Mitchell et al, 2006;GilTena et al, 2007). The observed association between coniferous species and forest bird species richness was positive.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this sense, the weak association between species richness and the percentage of monospecific stands is supporting the reported favourable effect of tree diversity at scales smaller than 1 × 1 km. Regarding the type of forest, that is, coniferous or broadleaved species, this seems not to be so determinant for species richness as forest cover or other structural features (see also Mitchell et al, 2006;GilTena et al, 2007). The observed association between coniferous species and forest bird species richness was positive.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Characteristics and processes that determine forest bird distribution may also be influencing other forest living organisms (Donald and Fuller, 1998) since birds play a key functional role in forest ecosystems and are often considered good biodiversity indicators (Sekercioglu, 2006). In this sense, apart from the stand scale, previous studies have shown that forest habitat characteristics are related to bird distribution at different spatial scales (Warren et al, 2005;Yamaura et al, 2005;Mitchell et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simpson, Camargo and Smith & Wilson in evenness and Shannon-Wiener, Brillouin and Simpson in biodiversity. 3,14,15 It is believed that each one of the mentioned criteria may provide meaningful understanding of the wetland's biodiversity changes. The integration of biodiversity monitoring is an essential step in the assessment of the wetland's conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The different environmental conditions at the various levels within the canopy creates a wide variety of ecological niches, which in general enables more structurally complex stands to support a higher number of species. For certain groups of organisms such as birds, stand structure is a strong determinant of diversity (Mitchell et al 2006). Through management, such as the application of particular silvicultural systems (Kerr 2009) stand structures can be developed that best meet the mix of objectives for a particular site.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%