2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2011.03.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationships between autistic-like and schizotypy traits: An analysis using the Autism Spectrum Quotient and Oxford-Liverpool Inventory of Feelings and Experiences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

9
65
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
9
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Individuals are provided with 50 statements and asked to indicate on a 4-point scale how well each statement applies to them (strongly agree, agree, disagree, strongly disagree). The items were scored on a scale ranging from 1 to 4, on the basis of previous research, according to which this scoring method retains more information about responses than does dichotomous scoring that was first proposed for this instrument (Baron-Cohen et al , 2001; Austin, 2005; Stewart and Austin, 2009; Russell-Smith et al , 2011). Scores for each item are summed to provide the total AQ, with higher scores indicating greater autistic-like traits.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Individuals are provided with 50 statements and asked to indicate on a 4-point scale how well each statement applies to them (strongly agree, agree, disagree, strongly disagree). The items were scored on a scale ranging from 1 to 4, on the basis of previous research, according to which this scoring method retains more information about responses than does dichotomous scoring that was first proposed for this instrument (Baron-Cohen et al , 2001; Austin, 2005; Stewart and Austin, 2009; Russell-Smith et al , 2011). Scores for each item are summed to provide the total AQ, with higher scores indicating greater autistic-like traits.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Factor analyses of the AQ in several countries have consistently identified three clear factors, related to social ability, attention to detail/patterns, and the understanding of others. In the current study, we divided items into the subscales identified in a study of Western Australian adults (Russell-Smith et al , 2011) who were highly similar to the sample under investigation here: Social Skills, Details/Patterns, and Communication/Mindreading. There is minimal difference between the items in these subscales and those reported in other factor analyses.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individuals are provided with 50 statements and asked to indicate on a 4-point scale how well that statement applies to them (strongly agree, agree, disagree, strongly disagree). The items were scored on a scale ranging from 1 to 4, based on previous research that this scoring method retains more information about responses than the dichotomous scoring first proposed for this instrument (Baron-Cohen et al, 2001; Austin, 2005; Stewart and Austin, 2009; Russell-Smith et al, 2011). Scores on each item are summed to provide a Total AQ, with higher scores indicating greater autistic-like traits.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We calculated scores for overall AQ and three subfactors: social skills, Details/Patterns, and Communication/Mind Reading (Hurst et al 2007;Russell-Smith et al 2011). Handedness was assessed using the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory (Oldfield 1971).…”
Section: Questionnairesmentioning
confidence: 99%