2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11031-017-9650-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationships at risk: How the perceived risk of ending a romantic relationship influences the intensity of romantic affect and relationship commitment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…his suggests that, in general, children with molar DDE would need to be more intensely motivated by the dental hygienist and/or their parents to daily oral hygiene; or, in other cases, on the contrary, that children with molar DDE pay particular attention to their oral health. In this respect, it must be recognized that both motivational and cognitive factors play a pivotal role in human relations, which in turn are driven by-and have implications for-people's perceptions, decisions and behaviors both at the individual and group relational level [25][26][27][28][29][30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…his suggests that, in general, children with molar DDE would need to be more intensely motivated by the dental hygienist and/or their parents to daily oral hygiene; or, in other cases, on the contrary, that children with molar DDE pay particular attention to their oral health. In this respect, it must be recognized that both motivational and cognitive factors play a pivotal role in human relations, which in turn are driven by-and have implications for-people's perceptions, decisions and behaviors both at the individual and group relational level [25][26][27][28][29][30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike previous literature, we also observed an interesting within-person interaction, such that on days when a person experienced more COVID-induced relatedness frustration than was typical for them, daily negative fantasies were associated with lower daily presumptuous romantic intentions. Perhaps the combination of higher-than-usual COVID-induced relatedness frustration and negative fantasies within an individual reflected a level of difficulty in romantic pursuit that was too high to summon the effort required to pursue presumptuously (Sciara & Pantaleo, 2018 ). Future work is needed to expand on this novel investigation of within-person predictors of daily presumptuous romantic intentions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These predictions are in line with other theories of motivation. Per motivational intensity theory, negative fantasies that heighten the perceived degree of difficulty in pursuing the romantic interest should increase effort mobilization—here, stronger intentions to take a presumptuous course of action—so long as the relationship is sufficiently desirable (Sciara & Pantaleo, 2018 ). Moreover, the same needs-as-motives (e.g., Prentice et al, 2014 ) logic used in discussing COVID-induced relatedness threat can be applied here.…”
Section: Negative Fantasies About a Romantic Interestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even if research has shown that in some circumstances interfering/distracting stimuli have the power to strengthen motivation (Silvia & Brehm, ), beyond a certain level of intensity those stimuli will drastically discourage people from pursuing their motivational (learning) goals, both in interpersonal and intergroup settings (cf. Silvia & Brehm, ; Wright & Pantaleo, ; see also Donato et al, ; Pantaleo, Miron, Ferguson, & Frankowski, ; Sciara & Pantaleo, )—this reflecting the detrimental effects of information overload on learning (Wicklund & Pantaleo, ). Second, while affect‐rich stimuli (e.g., video communications) may be generally more stimulating and compelling than less emotionally laden stimuli, they may not necessarily lead to a better understanding of the communication, as strong emotional content may reduce people’s sensitivity to objective information (Hsee & Rottenstreich, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%