1968
DOI: 10.2527/jas1968.27153x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationships among Some Common Live and Carcass Measurements and Beef Carcass Composition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reiling et al (1992) fovmd inclusion of percentage of trimmed round with the four factors in the USDA retail yield equation to improve the R~ from .48 to .67. Alone, percentage of trimmed round accounted for 57% of the variation in retail yield in this study, whereas Brackelsberg and Willham (1968) reported only 30%. Other studies confirm that percent boneless round is highly correlated (r = .71 to .83) with percent retail yield or percent separable muscle (Henderson et al.…”
Section: Sample Cutsmentioning
confidence: 52%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Reiling et al (1992) fovmd inclusion of percentage of trimmed round with the four factors in the USDA retail yield equation to improve the R~ from .48 to .67. Alone, percentage of trimmed round accounted for 57% of the variation in retail yield in this study, whereas Brackelsberg and Willham (1968) reported only 30%. Other studies confirm that percent boneless round is highly correlated (r = .71 to .83) with percent retail yield or percent separable muscle (Henderson et al.…”
Section: Sample Cutsmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…In live cattle. Brackelsberg and Willham (1968) found live muscle or conformation score to be unrelated to percentage of muscle or fat trim in the carcass. In contrast, live condition score was moderately correlated v^dth percentage of fat trim in the carcass (r = .29 to .44).…”
Section: Subjective Measuresmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Between separate bones and the bone quantity In a study by Brackelsberg et al (1968) the correlation obtained between fore shank meat-% and carcass meat-% was 0.61, the correlation between the corresponding bone-% was 0.43, and between fat-% 0.23. In all experiments the rounds were dissected of the hind quarters behind the last lumbar vertebra.…”
Section: Dissection Of Flanksmentioning
confidence: 99%