The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
2022
DOI: 10.1007/s12517-022-09482-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationships among plasticity, clay fraction and activity of clay–sand mixtures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The British cone [25] specifies a 30°/80 g cone and a 20 mm penetration depth at the liquid limit, while the Swedish cone specifies a 60°/60 g cone and a 10 mm penetration depth at the liquid limit. However, both types of cone penetration tests provide approximately the same results [7,26]. While the liquid limit values are calculated with greater confidence, it is hard to make same comment for the plastic limit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The British cone [25] specifies a 30°/80 g cone and a 20 mm penetration depth at the liquid limit, while the Swedish cone specifies a 60°/60 g cone and a 10 mm penetration depth at the liquid limit. However, both types of cone penetration tests provide approximately the same results [7,26]. While the liquid limit values are calculated with greater confidence, it is hard to make same comment for the plastic limit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…According to table 2, Esfarayen soil has high percentage of clay, which should have high adhesion. Due to the Table 3, PI of samples is low that shows shortage of clay percentage (Karakan, 2022). This conflict can be caused by particles in clay dimensions (Kleyn et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have been carried out in recent years to understand the plasticity behavior of clays using the Atterberg and Pfefferkorn methods (Crozetta et al, 2016;Karakan & Demir, 2018; https://doi.org/10.1180/clm.2023.9 Published online by Cambridge University Press Shimobe & Sezer, 2020;Karakan & Demir, 2020;Karakan, 2022a;Karakan 2022b) and, more recently, the indentation method. Doménech et al (1994) evaluated the plasticity of ceramic compositions using the indentation method and determined that the liquid limit (LL) and the plastic limit (PL) can be obtained for consistencies (applied force) of 1 and 46 N, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the red ceramics sector, the most widespread methods used are those of Atterberg and Pfefferkorn . Several studies have been carried out in recent years on the interpretation of the plastic behaviours of clays using the Atterberg and Pfefferkorn methods (Crozetta et al, 2016;Karakan & Demir, 2018Karakan, 2022aKarakan, , 2022b and the indentation method. Doménech et al (1994) evaluated the plasticity of ceramic compositions using the indentation method and determined that the liquid limit (LL) and the plastic limit (PL) can be obtained for consistencies (applied forces) of 1 and 46 N, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation