1969
DOI: 10.1002/1520-6807(196907)6:3<315::aid-pits2310060320>3.0.co;2-c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationships among measures of adjustment, sociometric status and achievement in third graders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although our primary interest pertains to future consequences of peer rejection, the causal chain between peer status and academic achievement is unclear and probably goes in both directions. Several interactional and behavioural factors have been considered as important determinants of social status and some interest has also been given to cognitive and athletic skills (Coleman, 1980;Eitzen, 1975;Green, Forehand, Beck, & Vosk, 1980;McMichael, 1980;Wentzel, 1991;Wentzel & Asher, 1995;Yellott, Liem, & Cowen, 1969). Academic achievement may provide a reputation and competence that affects popularity in a positive direction, while deficits in academic ability may have negative consequences for popularity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although our primary interest pertains to future consequences of peer rejection, the causal chain between peer status and academic achievement is unclear and probably goes in both directions. Several interactional and behavioural factors have been considered as important determinants of social status and some interest has also been given to cognitive and athletic skills (Coleman, 1980;Eitzen, 1975;Green, Forehand, Beck, & Vosk, 1980;McMichael, 1980;Wentzel, 1991;Wentzel & Asher, 1995;Yellott, Liem, & Cowen, 1969). Academic achievement may provide a reputation and competence that affects popularity in a positive direction, while deficits in academic ability may have negative consequences for popularity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Questions have been raised, however, concerning the ability of children to label such deviance accurately. Cowen and his associates have reported that the peer ratings of third-grade children, although predictive of adult psychiatric maladjustment, provided a less than satisfactory measure of children's current levels of social and emotional functioning (Cowen, Zax, Izzo, & Trost, 1966; Liem, Cowen, Trost, & Izzo, 1969; Yellott, Liem, & Cowen, 1969). According to these investigators, teacher and parent ratings corresponded better than peer ratings to a criterion measure of adjustment status, which was comprised of clinician reports, family interviews, and classroom observations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%