Relationships among lumbar hip motion angle, perceptual awareness, and low back pain in young adults

Miyachi, Ryo; Sano, Ayaka; Tanaka, Nana; Tamai, Misaki; Miyazaki, Junichi

doi:10.1589/jpts.33.880

Cited by 5 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 32 publications

(35 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Relationships based on cross‐sectional data between spinal amplitude and disability were available for 69 studies and 5899 participants (Adamu et al, 2019; Alschuler et al, 2009; Alves et al, 2020; Ansari et al, 2014; Atya, 2013; Aure & Kvåle, 2022; Bayar et al, 2003; Bazzaz‐Yamchi et al, 2021; Caporaso et al, 2012; Carrasco‐Martínez et al, 2019; Christe et al, 2016; Coyle et al, 2017; de Brito Macedo et al, 2019; Demoulin et al, 2013; Deyo, 1986; Dubois et al, 2016; Duray et al, 2018; Ekedahl et al, 2010; Fehrmann et al, 2017; Felicio et al, 2017; Garcia et al, 2013; Grönblad et al, 1997; Grosdent et al, 2023; Grotle et al, 2004; Hidalgo et al, 2015; Hofste et al, 2021; Hrkać et al, 2022; Hurri et al, 1995; Ibrahim et al, 2019; Jette et al, 2016; Joshi et al, 2021; Kang et al, 1995; Karayannis et al, 2023; Kiran et al, 2017; La Touche et al, 2019; Larivière et al, 2022; Lee et al, 2001; Lenoir dit Caron et al, 2022; Loisel et al, 1998; Louw et al, 2015; Louw, Farrell, et al, 2017; Mannion et al, 2001; Matheve et al, 2019; Melikoglu et al, 2009; Miyachi et al, 2021; Nattrass et al, 1999; Nemcić et al, 2013; Nordstoga et al, 2019; Ostelo et al, 2003; Ozkaraoglu et al, 2020; Parks et al, 2003; Rainville et al, 1994; Sakulsriprasert et al, 2011; Sasani et al, 2008; Satpute et al, 2019; Scharovsky et al,…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Relationships based on cross‐sectional data between spinal amplitude and pain intensity were available for 74 studies with 5806 participants (Alschuler et al, 2009; Alves et al, 2020; Anderson et al, 2013; Ansari et al, 2014; Aure & Kvåle, 2022; Bazzaz‐Yamchi et al, 2021; Caporaso et al, 2012; Carpino et al, 2020; Carrasco‐Martínez et al, 2019; Christe et al, 2016; Coyle et al, 2017; de Brito Macedo et al, 2019; Demoulin et al, 2013; Du et al, 2017; Dubois et al, 2016; Duray et al, 2018; Fehrmann et al, 2017; Garcia et al, 2013; Geller et al, 2016; Grosdent et al, 2023; Grotle et al, 2004; Hidalgo et al, 2015; Hofste et al, 2021; Hrkać et al, 2022; Ibrahim et al, 2019; Jensen et al, 2010; Jette et al, 2016; Joshi et al, 2021; Kernan & Rainville, 2007; Kienbacher et al, 2017; Kiran et al, 2017; Larivière et al, 2022; Lenoir dit Caron et al, 2022; Louw et al, 2015; Louw, Farrell, et al, 2017; Louw, Zimney, et al, 2017; Mannion et al, 2001; Marich et al, 2017; Matheve et al, 2019; McCracken et al, 2002; Melikoglu et al, 2009; Mieritz et al, 2014; Miyachi et al, 2021; Neblett et al, 2013; Nemcić et al, 2013; Nordstoga et al, 2019; Olaogun et al, 2004; Ostelo et al, 2003; Osumi et al, 2019; Ozkaraoglu et al, 2020; Pagé et al, 2015; Papciak & Feuerstein, 1991; Peng et al, 2016; Preyde, 2000; Sakulsriprasert et al, 2011…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Macedo et al, 2019;Demoulin et al, 2013;Du et al, 2017;Dubois et al, 2016;Duray et al, 2018;Fehrmann et al, 2017;Garcia et al, 2013;Geller et al, 2016;Grosdent et al, 2023;Grotle et al, 2004;Hidalgo et al, 2015;Hofste et al, 2021;Hrkać et al, 2022;Ibrahim et al, 2019;Jensen et al, 2010;Jette et al, 2016;Joshi et al, 2021;Kernan & Rainville, 2007;Kienbacher et al, 2017;Kiran et al, 2017; Larivière et al, 2022;Lenoir dit Caron et al, 2022;Louw et al, 2015;Louw, Farrell, et al, 2017;Louw, Zimney, et al, 2017;Mannion et al, 2001;Marich et al, 2017;Matheve et al, 2019;McCracken et al, 2002;Melikoglu et al, 2009;Mieritz et al, 2014;Miyachi et al, 2021;Neblett et al, 2013;Nemcić et al, 2013;Nordstoga et al, 2019;Olaogun et al, 2004;Ostelo et al, 2003;Osumi et al, 2019;Ozkaraoglu et al, 2020;Pagé et al, 2015;…”

unclassified

See 2 more Smart Citations

The relationships between spinal amplitude of movement, pain and disability in low back pain: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Nzamba

Damme

Favre

et al. 2023

European Journal of Pain

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and ObjectivesThe role of spinal movement alterations in low back pain (LBP) remains unclear. This systematic review and meta‐analyses examined the relationships between spinal amplitude of movement, disability and pain intensity in patients with LBP.Databases and Data TreatmentWe searched PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, Pedro and Web of Science for relevant articles until 14th March 2023. Risk of bias was assessed with the Quality in Prognostic Studies Tool. We analysed the relationships between amplitude of movement, disability and pain intensity with standard correlational meta‐analyses and meta‐analytic structural equation modelling (MASEM) in cross‐sectional and longitudinal data.ResultsA total of 106 studies (9001 participants) were included. In cross‐sectional data, larger amplitude of movement was associated with lower disability (pooled coefficient: −0.25, 95% confidence interval: [−0.29 to −0.21]; 69/5899 studies/participants) and pain intensity (−0.13, [−0.17 to −0.09]; 74/5806). An increase in amplitude of movement was associated with a decrease in disability (−0.23, [−0.31 to −0.15]; 33/2437) and pain intensity (−0.25, [−0.33 to −0.17]; 38/2172) in longitudinal data. MASEM revealed similar results and, in addition, showed that amplitude of movement had a very small influence on the pain intensity–disability relationship.ConclusionsThese results showed a significant but small association between amplitude of movement and disability or pain intensity. Moreover, they demonstrated a direct association between an increase in amplitude of movement and a decrease in pain intensity or disability, supporting interventions aiming to reduce protective spinal movements in patients with LBP.SignificanceThe large meta‐analyses performed in this work revealed an association between reductions in spinal amplitude of movement and increased levels of disability and pain intensity in people with LBP. Moreover, it highlighted that LBP recovery is associated with a reduction in protective motor behaviour (increased amplitude of movement), supporting the inclusion of spinal movement in the biopsychosocial understanding and management of LBP.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

unclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

The relationships between spinal amplitude of movement, pain and disability in low back pain: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Nzamba

Damme

Favre

et al. 2023

European Journal of Pain

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Further, the disability level is categorized based on percentage into minimal disability (0-20%), moderate disability (21-40%), severe disability (41-60%), crippled (61-80%), and completely disabled (81-100%). The questionnaire requires around 5 min to finish and approximately 1-2 min to score [17,18].…”

Section: Experimental Procedures and Measurementsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Enhancing Functional Ability in Chronic Nonspecific Lower Back Pain: The Impact of EMG-Guided Trunk Stabilization Exercises

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Nonspecific lower back pain (NSLBP) is described as pain that is not caused by an identifiable, well-known disease, such as infection, tumor, osteoporosis, fracture, structural deformity, inflammatory condition, radicular syndrome, or cauda equina syndrome. Aim: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of EMG-guided trunk stabilization exercises on functional disability associated with LBP. Materials and Methods: A single-blinded pre- and post-test experimental comparative design was used for this study. Fifty individuals with chronic NSLBP were screened for inclusion criteria. Of these, forty were randomly grouped into the EMG group receiving trunk-stability exercises with electromyography biofeedback and non-EMG group receiving trunk-stabilization exercises without EMG biofeedback. Participants performed five trunk-stability exercises 3 days a week for 4 weeks. The intensity of pain, range of motion, functional disability, and balance were measured at baseline and after 4 weeks. Results: Both techniques indicated a significant effect on chronic NSLBP; however, trunk-stability exercises combined with EMG biofeedback produced better results in alleviating the intensity of pain, increasing the range of motion, and improving functional disabilities and static balance. Conclusion: The present study confirms that trunk-stability exercises with EMG biofeedback can be practiced safely, contributes to a greater boost in neuromuscular efficiency in the lumbar flexors and extensors, and is effective in modifying functional disability for patients with NSLBP.

show abstract

Measuring Lumbar Motion Angle With a Small Accelerometer: A Reliability Study

Miyachi

Sano

Tanaka

et al. 2022

Journal of Chiropractic Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Relationships among lumbar hip motion angle, perceptual awareness, and low back pain in young adults

Cited by 5 publications

References 32 publications

The relationships between spinal amplitude of movement, pain and disability in low back pain: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

The relationships between spinal amplitude of movement, pain and disability in low back pain: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Enhancing Functional Ability in Chronic Nonspecific Lower Back Pain: The Impact of EMG-Guided Trunk Stabilization Exercises

Measuring Lumbar Motion Angle With a Small Accelerometer: A Reliability Study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About