1985
DOI: 10.1080/19485565.1985.9988600
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationships among companies of militia in the colony of New York in 1760 estimated by an analysis of their surnames

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Spearman's rho, a rank order correlation coefficient, was used rather than Pearson's product-moment correlation because of potential problems in estimation of inbreeding, nonnormality, and nonlinearity of expected relationships. One potential problem in such analyses is that the number of isonymous marriages in most human populations is so small that sampling error tends to be high (Lasker, 1985). While nonparametric correlation provides a partial solution, the problem of estimation for the total and nonrandom inbreeding components must be Cohort NM1 NM2 NM1 NM2 NM1 NM2 NM1 NM2 NM1 NM2 1741-69 142 139 1770-84 151 147 179 168 170 170 1785-99 68 64 251 238 215 203 279 272 1800-09 77 77 144 142 181 172 161 154 211 205 1810-19 83 82 124 120 174 165 196 180 186 177 1820-29 114 109 143 136 192 191 199 190 240 227 1830-39 60 60 202 188 222 215 2 14 198 286 279 1840-49 120 114 208 202 222 216 296 275 328 316 kept in mind.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Spearman's rho, a rank order correlation coefficient, was used rather than Pearson's product-moment correlation because of potential problems in estimation of inbreeding, nonnormality, and nonlinearity of expected relationships. One potential problem in such analyses is that the number of isonymous marriages in most human populations is so small that sampling error tends to be high (Lasker, 1985). While nonparametric correlation provides a partial solution, the problem of estimation for the total and nonrandom inbreeding components must be Cohort NM1 NM2 NM1 NM2 NM1 NM2 NM1 NM2 NM1 NM2 1741-69 142 139 1770-84 151 147 179 168 170 170 1785-99 68 64 251 238 215 203 279 272 1800-09 77 77 144 142 181 172 161 154 211 205 1810-19 83 82 124 120 174 165 196 180 186 177 1820-29 114 109 143 136 192 191 199 190 240 227 1830-39 60 60 202 188 222 215 2 14 198 286 279 1840-49 120 114 208 202 222 216 296 275 328 316 kept in mind.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While nonparametric correlation provides a partial solution, the problem of estimation for the total and nonrandom inbreeding components must be Cohort NM1 NM2 NM1 NM2 NM1 NM2 NM1 NM2 NM1 NM2 1741-69 142 139 1770-84 151 147 179 168 170 170 1785-99 68 64 251 238 215 203 279 272 1800-09 77 77 144 142 181 172 161 154 211 205 1810-19 83 82 124 120 174 165 196 180 186 177 1820-29 114 109 143 136 192 191 199 190 240 227 1830-39 60 60 202 188 222 215 2 14 198 286 279 1840-49 120 114 208 202 222 216 296 275 328 316 kept in mind. The estimate of random inbreeding, however, is less problematic since it is based on a larger sample size (Lasker, 1985). All analyses were performed on a Zenith 158 microcomputer using the NCSS statistical package, Version 5.0 (Hintze, 1987).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Different studies have used surname analysis to correlate genetic parameters (e.g. drift, kinship and migrations) and population structure (Gottlieb, 1983;Lasker, 1985;Zei et al 2003). Recently, Cavalli-Sforza et al (2004) have shown a significant correlation between the estimates of inbreeding obtained from consanguinity and those obtained from surname data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%