2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2005.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationships among characiform fishes inferred from analysis of nuclear and mitochondrial gene sequences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

19
213
3
29

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 212 publications
(264 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
19
213
3
29
Order By: Relevance
“…At deeper phylogenetic levels in fishes, including suprafamilial categories within siluriforms, rag2 has been shown to be more variable and contain stronger signal (e.g. Lavoué and Sullivan, 2004;Calcagnotto et al, 2005;Sullivan et al, 2006). The lack of resolution or poorly supported nodes among basal ariines is consistent with MP and BI reconstructions derived from both mitochondrial and nuclear datasets.…”
Section: Congruence Conflicts and Phylogenetic Signalsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…At deeper phylogenetic levels in fishes, including suprafamilial categories within siluriforms, rag2 has been shown to be more variable and contain stronger signal (e.g. Lavoué and Sullivan, 2004;Calcagnotto et al, 2005;Sullivan et al, 2006). The lack of resolution or poorly supported nodes among basal ariines is consistent with MP and BI reconstructions derived from both mitochondrial and nuclear datasets.…”
Section: Congruence Conflicts and Phylogenetic Signalsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Characiforms are generally assumed to have a Gondwanan (South American) origin [30][31][32], as supported by the fossil record [33], so the presence of Characidae in Northern America is viewed as a consequence of dispersal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RAG2 gene encodes components of the recombinase involved in recombination of immunoglobin and T-cell receptor genes and appears as conserved single copies in all examined vertebrates (Hansen and Kaattari, 1996;Willett et al, 1997). The RAG2 gene has been widely used to evaluate intrageneric and intraspeciWc relationships (Baker et al, 2000;Clements et al, 2004;Hardman, 2004;Lewis-Oritt et al, 2001;Lovejoy and Collette, 2001), and it is also used to reveal higher-level phylogenetic relationships (Brinkmann et al, 2004;Calcagnotto et al, 2005). Although the considerable morphological variability of East Asian cyprinids represents a challenge to phylogenetic analyses based on morphology, we included representative species from all hypothesized subfamilies (Chen, 1998) in our present molecular analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%